Robot-assisted pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: an international Delphi study of expert users.

Surgical endoscopy 2023 Vol.37(7) p. 5215-5225

Simoncini T, Panattoni A, Aktas M, Ampe J, Betschart C, Bloemendaal ALA, Buse S, Campagna G, Caretto M, Cervigni M, Consten ECJ, Davila HH, Dubuisson J, Espin-Basany E, Fabiani B, Faucheron JL, Giannini A, Gurland B, Hahnloser D, Joukhadar R, Mannella P, Mereu L, Martellucci J, Meurette G, Montt Guevara MM, Ratto C, O'Reilly BA, Reisenauer C, Russo E, Schraffordt Koops S, Siddiqi S, Sturiale A, Naldini G

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Robotic surgery has gained popularity for the reconstruction of pelvic floor defects. Nonetheless, there is no evidence that robot-assisted reconstructive surgery is either appropriate or superior to standard laparoscopy for the performance of pelvic floor reconstructive procedures or that it is sustainable. The aim of this project was to address the proper role of robotic pelvic floor reconstructive procedures using expert opinion.

[METHODS] We set up an international, multidisciplinary group of 26 experts to participate in a Delphi process on robotics as applied to pelvic floor reconstructive surgery. The group comprised urogynecologists, urologists, and colorectal surgeons with long-term experience in the performance of pelvic floor reconstructive procedures and with the use of the robot, who were identified primarily based on peer-reviewed publications. Two rounds of the Delphi process were conducted. The first included 63 statements pertaining to surgeons' characteristics, general questions, indications, surgical technique, and future-oriented questions. A second round including 20 statements was used to reassess those statements where borderline agreement was obtained during the first round. The final step consisted of a face-to-face meeting with all participants to present and discuss the results of the analysis.

[RESULTS] The 26 experts agreed that robotics is a suitable indication for pelvic floor reconstructive surgery because of the significant technical advantages that it confers relative to standard laparoscopy. Experts considered these advantages particularly important for the execution of complex reconstructive procedures, although the benefits can be found also during less challenging cases. The experts considered the robot safe and effective for pelvic floor reconstruction and generally thought that the additional costs are offset by the increased surgical efficacy.

[CONCLUSION] Robotics is a suitable choice for pelvic reconstruction, but this Delphi initiative calls for more research to objectively assess the specific settings where robotic surgery would provide the most benefit.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
기법 robot-assisted 로봇수술 dict 2
기법 robotic surgery 로봇수술 dict 2
합병증 pelvic floor scispacy 1
합병증 pelvic scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] scispacy 1
질환 pelvic floor defects scispacy 1
질환 colorectal surgeons C0586901
Colorectal surgeon
scispacy 1
기타 colorectal scispacy 1
기타 participants scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Robotics; Pelvic Floor; Delphi Technique; Surgery, Plastic; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Laparoscopy

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문