Evaluation of Facial Trauma Scars After Treating by Refining Plastic Surgery Techniques: A Follow-Up Study.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Although early debridement and refining plastic surgery techniques have been shown to be effective in the treatment of facial scars after trauma, their postoperative outcomes have not been quantitatively evaluated by the relevant Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale. This study was designed to provide a fair assessment of the appearance and local symptoms of scars after treatment by refining plastic surgery techniques and to share the operational skills of surgical repairs.
[PATIENTS AND METHODS] Patients who received refining plastic surgery techniques were followed up, and facial scars were taken as high-definition photos, which were presented to 6 professional observers, 6 lay observers, and patients themselves to score the facial scars, including: scar spread, erythema, dyspigmentation, track marks or suture marks, hypertrophy/atrophy, itch and pain according to the SCAR.
[RESULTS] There were 56 patients who met the inclusion criteria and 25 agreed to participate in the study. No hypertrophic scar was found, and all patients were satisfied with the scar control effect. The scores showed that the treatment was achieved good results in scar spread (pro group: 0.85±0.55, lay group: 0.96±0.68, patients: 0.92±0.64), erythema (pro group: 0.34±0.26, lay group: 0.45±0.37, patients: 0.32±0.48), hypertrophy/atrophy (pro group: 0.21±0.27, lay group: 0.21±0.31, patients: 0.32±0.48), and there was no significant difference in the scores of the 3 observation groups ( P >0.05). However, it is difficult to eliminate dyspigmentation (pro group: 0.29±0.26, lay group: 0.30±0.30, patients: 0.40±0.50), track marks or suture marks (pro group: 0.45±0.33, lay group: 0.59±0.30, patients: 0.36±0.49). Two (8%) patients complained of itch and 1 (4%) patient complained of both itch and pain in the past 24 hours.
[CONCLUSIONS] The appearance of facial scars is satisfactory, the local symptoms are mild, and the evaluation among different aesthetics is affirmative after receiving refining plastic surgery techniques, which is just in line with the purpose of seeking beauty for the patients, and meanwhile can provide a good foundation for the comprehensive treatment of late scars, so that the treatment plan should be promoted.
[PATIENTS AND METHODS] Patients who received refining plastic surgery techniques were followed up, and facial scars were taken as high-definition photos, which were presented to 6 professional observers, 6 lay observers, and patients themselves to score the facial scars, including: scar spread, erythema, dyspigmentation, track marks or suture marks, hypertrophy/atrophy, itch and pain according to the SCAR.
[RESULTS] There were 56 patients who met the inclusion criteria and 25 agreed to participate in the study. No hypertrophic scar was found, and all patients were satisfied with the scar control effect. The scores showed that the treatment was achieved good results in scar spread (pro group: 0.85±0.55, lay group: 0.96±0.68, patients: 0.92±0.64), erythema (pro group: 0.34±0.26, lay group: 0.45±0.37, patients: 0.32±0.48), hypertrophy/atrophy (pro group: 0.21±0.27, lay group: 0.21±0.31, patients: 0.32±0.48), and there was no significant difference in the scores of the 3 observation groups ( P >0.05). However, it is difficult to eliminate dyspigmentation (pro group: 0.29±0.26, lay group: 0.30±0.30, patients: 0.40±0.50), track marks or suture marks (pro group: 0.45±0.33, lay group: 0.59±0.30, patients: 0.36±0.49). Two (8%) patients complained of itch and 1 (4%) patient complained of both itch and pain in the past 24 hours.
[CONCLUSIONS] The appearance of facial scars is satisfactory, the local symptoms are mild, and the evaluation among different aesthetics is affirmative after receiving refining plastic surgery techniques, which is just in line with the purpose of seeking beauty for the patients, and meanwhile can provide a good foundation for the comprehensive treatment of late scars, so that the treatment plan should be promoted.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 해부 | facial
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | SCAR
→ Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | hypertrophic scar
|
비후성흉터 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | Facial Trauma
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | scar
→ Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | erythema
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | Trauma
|
C0043251
Wounds and Injuries
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | scars
|
C0241158
Scar Tissue
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | erythema
|
C0041834
Erythema
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | dyspigmentation
|
C1260926
Abnormal pigmentation
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | itch
|
C0033774
Pruritus
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | pain
|
C0030193
Pain
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | Scar
→ Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | 0.85±0.55
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | 0.40±0.50
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | 0.45±0.33
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | 0.59±0.30
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | Patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patient
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Humans; Cicatrix; Follow-Up Studies; Surgery, Plastic; Cicatrix, Hypertrophic; Facial Injuries; Hypertrophy; Pain; Erythema; Atrophy; Treatment Outcome
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Otoplasty for prominent ear: A systematic review of surgical techniques.
- The Effects and Mechanisms of Botulinum Toxin Type A on Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids.
- ASAP revisited: The Brazilian sequential algorithm for treating keloids and hypertrophic scars.
- Botulinum toxin A prevents hypertrophic scarring by suppressing PARP14/SOCS2-mediated M2 polarization of macrophages.
- [Influence and mechanism of extracellular vesicles derived from human dermal papilla cells on skin fibrosis in mice].