Breast implants under siege: an historical commentary.

Journal of long-term effects of medical implants 1992 Vol.1(3) p. 243-53

Fisher JC, Brody GS

관련 도메인

Abstract

Despite 3 decades of rapidly expanding application of polydimethylsiloxane as a relatively safe implantable biomaterial, the American public is being told by a vocal minority that its use in the breast implant may be dangerous. Most of the furor has been generated by consumer advocates with support of a handful of scientists who have expressed opinions, not well supported by facts, about the risks of these devices. These anxieties have been fueled in the public's mind by a media more interested in sensationalism than disciplined reporting. The controversy has complicated the regulatory process and has become politicized in the halls of State Legislatures and Congress. Remarkably, this controversy has not involved the many other biomedical applications of silicone. How has this controversy gathered momentum? What role has the government played and how have the professional, scientific, corporate, and patient communities responded to public concern? This discussion places the breast implant battle into an historical perspective.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 breast 유방 dict 3
합병증 breast implant scispacy 1
약물 polydimethylsiloxane C0012436
Dimethylpolysiloxanes
scispacy 1
약물 silicone C0037114
silicones
scispacy 1
질환 breast implant battle scispacy 1
기타 patient scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Breast; Consumer Advocacy; Female; History, 20th Century; Humans; Legislation, Medical; Mammaplasty; Physician's Role; Prostheses and Implants; Silicone Elastomers; Surgery, Plastic; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문