Patterns in Academic Cosmetic Surgery Practice: Population Differences and Procedure Preferences.

Annals of plastic surgery 2022 Vol.88(5 Suppl 5) p. S490-S494

Moore R, Zilinskas K, Tarabishy S, Herrera FA

관련 도메인

Abstract

[PURPOSE] Although growth in cosmetic surgery remains constant in the private setting, academic cosmetic surgery practices are often underdeveloped. Our study aims to determine which patient populations access academic cosmetic surgery services.

[METHODS] The 2018 Health Care Utilization Project Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample database was used for data analysis. Encounters for the following American Society of Plastic Surgery top 5 procedures for 2020 were selected: blepharoplasty, breast augmentation, liposuction, rhinoplasty, and rhytidectomy. Patient encounter data were collected because it relates to median income, geographic location, and primary payer status.

[RESULTS] The 2018 Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample data set contained 44,078 encounters at academic surgical centers for the procedures listed previously. Low-income patients account for 13.7% of academic cosmetic surgery encounters compared with 37.9% for high-income patients. Breast augmentation rates are higher among low-income patients (20.5% vs 17.2%, P < 0.001), and high-income patients undergo rhytidectomy more frequently (5.7% vs 3.0%, P < 0.001). In the academic setting, patients from large metropolitan areas encompass the majority of cosmetic encounters (71.0%), and these patients are more likely to proceed with rhinoplasty, rhytidectomy, and liposuction procedures (P < 0.001). Patients from smaller metropolitan areas undergo blepharoplasty more frequently compared with those from larger metropolitan areas (56.4% vs 41.8%, P < 0.001). Self-pay and privately insured patients comprise the majority of academic cosmetic surgery encounters (40.8% and 29.9%, respectively). Eighty-eight percent of Medicare patients within this cohort underwent blepharoplasty, whereas self-pay patients accessed breast augmentation, liposuction, and rhytidectomy more often than other insured patients.

[CONCLUSIONS] Income status, patient location, and primary payer status play an important role in academic cosmetic surgery access rates and procedure preferences. Academic cosmetic practices can use these insights to tailor their services to the populations they serve.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 rhytidectomy 안면거상술 dict 4
시술 blepharoplasty 안검성형술 dict 3
시술 breast augmentation 유방성형술 dict 3
시술 liposuction 지방흡입 dict 3
해부 breast 유방 dict 3
시술 rhinoplasty 코성형술 dict 2
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] Income scispacy 1
질환 payer scispacy 1
기타 patient scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Aged; Blepharoplasty; Humans; Mammaplasty; Medicare; Rhinoplasty; Surgery, Plastic; United States

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문