Clinical Comparison of 3 Different Double Eyelid Surgeries.

[OBJECTIVE] Double blepharoplasty or double eyelid surgery is a common plastic surgery in Asians. Our study aimed to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the minimally invasive 3-point subcutaneous tunnel double eyelid surgical technique relative to other commonly used approaches.

[METHOD] The study compared 852 single eyelid patients electing 1 of 3 double eyelid surgical options; minimally invasive 3-point subcutaneous tunnel, minimally invasive 3-point embedding, or incision double eyelid surgery. Evaluation criteria included postoperative swelling, hyperemia, pain, scarring, single eyelid recurrence, and patient satisfaction after 2 years.

[RESULTS] All surgical methods effectively achieved double eyelids. Directly after the procedure, the minimally invasive 3-point embedding method produced the mildest degree of swelling and congestion, followed by the 3-point subcutaneous tunnel method and then the incision method (F = 523.908, P = 0.000). The incision method also resulted in more serious postoperative pain, whereas the other 2 methods were equivalent (F = 83.117, P = 0.000). Patients in the incision group had the most severe scars compared with the other 2 groups with milder scarring (F = 882.102, P = 0.000). The minimally invasive 3-point embedding method group had the highest single eyelid recurrence rate (5.88%), whereas the recurrence rates for the other 2 methods were less than 1%. Patients satisfaction after 2 years was highest in the minimally invasive 3-point subcutaneous tunneling method, followed by the 3-point embedding method and lastly the incision method (F = 25.931, P = 0.00).

[CONCLUSIONS] Minimally invasive 3-point subcutaneous tunnel double eyelid surgery has advantages over other techniques, and its clinical application is worth promoting for suitable patients.