Pros and cons of subpectoral implantation.

Clinics in plastic surgery 1976 Vol.3(2) p. 321-37

Papillon J

관련 도메인

Abstract

At the present time, there is no universally accepted surgical technique or prosthesis for augmenting breast volume. Each surgeon has to choose with regard to shape, consistency, and volume, according to his own conviction and respecting his patient's priorities. These priorities will vary with age, profession, sexual habits, and marital and social status. In order to get the best possible results, the plastic surgeon should be adept at alternative methods and should not be restricted to one technique or one prosthesis. Patients vary considerably so our methods should be diversified. Our subpectoral implantations have given us better results than our retroglandular ones, which have been performed during the same period of time and with the same prosthesis. Consequently, retropectoral implantation is still our preferred procedure. We think that this technique, with its proper indications, deserves wider application.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
기법 subpectoral 근막하 평면 dict 2
해부 breast 유방 dict 1
기타 patient scispacy 1
기타 Patients scispacy 1
기타 retroglandular scispacy 1
기타 retropectoral scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Anesthesia; Anthropometry; Breast; Drainage; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Mastectomy; Muscular Diseases; Nipples; Pectoralis Muscles; Postoperative Complications; Prostheses and Implants; Surgery, Plastic; Thoracic Diseases; Thoracic Surgery; Thorax

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문