Assessing the Long-Term Impact of Non-Surgical Rhinoplasty on Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life: A Prospective Study Using FACE-Q.

Aesthetic plastic surgery 2025 Vol.49(13) p. 3629-3637

Lombardo GAG, Melita D, Stivala A, Cuomo R, Tamburino S

관련 도메인

Abstract

[INTRODUCTION] Non-surgical alternatives to rhinoplasty are gaining interest but, despite its popularity, research on the long-term psychological impact and post-rhinofiller patients' satisfaction is limited. This study evaluates patient-reported satisfaction and quality of life immediately after and 6 months post-non-surgical rhinoplasty using the FACE-Q questionnaire.

[PATIENTS AND METHODS] This prospective study was conducted from May 2023 to March 2024, involving 83 patients who underwent rhinofiller treatments for esthetic purposes. The FACE-Q questionnaire, assessing satisfaction with facial appearance, psychological function, and specific satisfaction with the nose, was administered before treatment, immediately after, and six months post-procedure. Statistical analyses compared pre- and post-treatment scores.

[RESULTS] Sixty-six patients fully responded to the FACE-Q questionnaire. Significant improvements were noted in satisfaction with facial appearance, psychological function, and specific satisfaction with the nose immediately after treatment (p < 0.05). Six months post-treatment, improvements were slightly reduced according to natural filler resorption. Nevertheless, this decrease was not statistically significant, meaning that the overall satisfaction was maintained after the procedure.

[CONCLUSIONS] Rhinofiller significantly enhances patient satisfaction and quality of life, with effects lasting much more than 6 months. In literature, this is the first article in which rhinofiller efficacy, durability and its impact on patient psycho-physical well-being are demonstrated through a validated method. The FACE-Q assessments confirm that rhinofiller is a viable, less invasive alternative to traditional rhinoplasty, offering substantial psychosocial benefits. Further research with larger samples and different populations is recommended to validate these findings and expand understanding of rhinofiller's long-term impact.

[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II] This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 rhinoplasty 코성형술 dict 4
시술 filler 필러 주입술 dict 1
해부 nose scispacy 1
합병증 nose scispacy 1
약물 [INTRODUCTION] Non-surgical scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] Rhinofiller scispacy 1
기타 Patient scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Quality of Life; Prospective Studies; Female; Patient Satisfaction; Male; Adult; Rhinoplasty; Middle Aged; Esthetics; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Young Adult; Follow-Up Studies; Time Factors; Dermal Fillers

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문