Artificial Intelligence for Patient Support: Assessing Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Answering Postoperative Rhinoplasty Questions.

Aesthetic surgery journal 2025 Vol.45(7) p. 735-744

Genovese A, Prabha S, Borna S, Gomez-Cabello CA, Haider SA, Trabilsy M, Tao C, Aziz KT, Murray PM, Forte AJ

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Although artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing healthcare, inaccurate or incomplete information from pretrained large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT poses significant risks to patient safety. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) offers a promising solution by leveraging curated knowledge bases to enhance accuracy and reliability, especially in high-demand specialties like plastic surgery.

[OBJECTIVES] This study evaluates the performance of RAG-enabled AI models in addressing postoperative rhinoplasty questions, aiming to assess their safety and identify necessary improvements for effective implementation into clinical care.

[METHODS] Four RAG models (Gemini-1.0-Pro-002, Gemini-1.5-Flash-001, Gemini-1.5-Pro-001, and PaLM 2) were tested on 30 common patient inquiries. Responses, sourced from authoritative rhinoplasty texts, were evaluated for accuracy (1-5 scale), comprehensiveness (1-3 scale), readability (Flesch Reading Ease [FRE], Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level), and understandability/actionability (Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool). Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon rank sum, Armitage trend tests, and pairwise comparisons.

[RESULTS] When responses were generated, they were generally accurate (41.7% completely accurate); however, a 30.8% nonresponse rate revealed potential challenges with query context interpretation and retrieval. Gemini-1.0-Pro-002 demonstrated superior comprehensiveness (P < .001), but readability (FRE: 40-49) and understandability (mean: 0.7) fell below patient education standards. PaLM 2 scored lowest in actionability (P < .007).

[CONCLUSIONS] This first application of RAG to postoperative rhinoplasty patient care highlights its strengths in accuracy alongside its limitations, including nonresponse and contextual understanding. Addressing these challenges will enable safer, more effective implementation of RAG models across diverse surgical and medical contexts, with the potential to revolutionize patient care by reducing physician workload while enhancing patient engagement.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 rhinoplasty 코성형술 dict 4
약물 RAG → Retrieval-augmented generation scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] scispacy 1
약물 [OBJECTIVES] scispacy 1
약물 Gemini-1.0-Pro-002 scispacy 1
약물 [FRE] scispacy 1
약물 PaLM 2 scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] scispacy 1
기타 Patient scispacy 1
기타 RAG → Retrieval-augmented generation scispacy 1
기타 PaLM 2 scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Rhinoplasty; Artificial Intelligence; Patient Education as Topic; Comprehension; Reproducibility of Results; Female; Male

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문