Pilot Study: Use of Stem Cell Therapy and Diced Cartilage in Secondary Rhinoplasty Cases Clinical Outcomes: The Golden Turkish Delight.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Although many techniques in the secondary rhinoplasty field have been developed in recent years, there are debates regarding achieving results with a high satisfaction rate. We aimed to share the surgical use technique in secondary rhinoplasty patients by enriching the Turkish delight technique with mesenchymal stem cells, which we described as the golden Turkish delight (GTD) technique, and the long-term patient satisfaction results.
[METHODS] The study was planned as prospective research, and 30 secondary rhinoplasty patients who presented to our service for rhinoplasty were included. The GTD technique was applied to these patients. The patient's satisfaction with the surgical procedure was evaluated at least 9-12 months after the surgery, and the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) was used as a measurement tool.
[RESULTS] Of the participants, the satisfaction levels of 30 patients were evaluated with a 1-year follow-up on average, and the rate of those who improved was found to be 80% using the GAIS score. The rate of those with high GAIS scores and those with high satisfaction levels was approximately 56%. Twenty percent of the patients were not satisfied with the result.
[CONCLUSIONS] When we evaluate the postoperative 1-year results of our patients in terms of satisfaction and complications, we may state that the absorption that may occur in the Turkish delight technique over time could give better results with the GTD technique. In addition to GTD and fat graft support, regenerative medicine products such as stromal vascular fraction are very effective in obtaining favorable results.
[METHODS] The study was planned as prospective research, and 30 secondary rhinoplasty patients who presented to our service for rhinoplasty were included. The GTD technique was applied to these patients. The patient's satisfaction with the surgical procedure was evaluated at least 9-12 months after the surgery, and the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) was used as a measurement tool.
[RESULTS] Of the participants, the satisfaction levels of 30 patients were evaluated with a 1-year follow-up on average, and the rate of those who improved was found to be 80% using the GAIS score. The rate of those with high GAIS scores and those with high satisfaction levels was approximately 56%. Twenty percent of the patients were not satisfied with the result.
[CONCLUSIONS] When we evaluate the postoperative 1-year results of our patients in terms of satisfaction and complications, we may state that the absorption that may occur in the Turkish delight technique over time could give better results with the GTD technique. In addition to GTD and fat graft support, regenerative medicine products such as stromal vascular fraction are very effective in obtaining favorable results.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | rhinoplasty
|
코성형술 | dict | 5 | |
| 해부 | Stem Cell
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | Diced Cartilage
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | mesenchymal stem cells
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | fat graft
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | GTD
→ golden Turkish delight
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patient
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | stromal vascular
|
scispacy | 1 |
📑 인용 관계
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Aesthetically ideal noses created using a single artificial intelligence model: Validating literature and exploring ethnic differences.
- Septocolumellar strut technique: Tip stability and aesthetic outcomes in rhinoplasty.
- Implications of Dermatologic Disorders in Facial Cosmetic Surgery: A Systematic Review.
- Factors on Quality of Life Improvement in Septorhinoplasty: Prospective Evaluation Using the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 and Its Minimally Important Difference.