Comparison of the efficacy of fat, cartilage, and bone grafts in traumatic and asymmetric noses.

[BACKGROUND] Correction of asymmetry and irregularity deformities with autologous grafts, without osteotomies, offers advantages to both plastic surgeons and patients with severe deviation. Various autologous tissues such as fat, bone, and cartilage grafts are viable options for this purpose.

[OBJECTIVES] This study aimed to compare the efficacy of 3 autologous filling materials in patients with bone asymmetry.

[METHODS] A retrospective evaluation was conducted on 297 patients seeking aesthetic nose surgery between 2015 and 2022. Only primary patients without prior surgery and those with bone asymmetry from trauma, with dorsum protrusion <3 mm, and without osteotomy were included. Patients were divided into fat, cartilage, and bone groups. Grafts were applied to the concave side during closed rhinoplasty, and evaluations were done 12 months after surgery by blinded plastic surgeons and patients using established assessment tools.

[RESULTS] Fat, cartilage, and bone grafts were utilized in 74, 127, and 96 patients, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 19 months. The mean graft volumes were 1.0 cc (bone), 1.3 cc (cartilage), and 1.6 cc (fat). The patient self-assessment scores were 75%, 84.9%, and 86.6%, respectively. The Asher-McDade averages were 77.2%, 86.7%, and 88.4%, respectively. Cartilage and bone graft results were statistically similar in patients' self-evaluation and significantly higher than those of fat grafts. Blinded assessments showed no significant difference between the cartilage and bone groups.

[CONCLUSION] Placing autologous grafts on the concave side for patients with minimal nasal bone protrusion (<3 mm) yields successful results. Cartilage grafts offer advantages in volume, result estimation, and preparation time, making them suitable for larger patient cohorts.