Maximizing Patient Satisfaction in Facial Feminizing Rhinoplasty.

[BACKGROUND] Although facial feminizing rhinoplasty can reduce gender dysphoria, there is limited evidence on approaches to maximize transgender patient satisfaction. In a retrospective cohort of transfeminine patients who underwent feminizing rhinoplasty, we compare pre- and postoperative nasal metrics and postoperative satisfaction.

[METHODS] Records were retrospectively reviewed to identify transfeminine patients who had feminizing rhinoplasty and cisgender females who had aesthetic rhinoplasty at least 8 weeks post-rhinoplasty. Transgender patients were contacted to rate their aesthetic and functional rhinoplasty satisfaction. Patients with 75% or greater of the total survey score were "very satisfied," those between 50% and 75% were "satisfied," and those below 50% were "less satisfied." The Vectra 3D imaging software was utilized to measure each patient's pre- and post-rhinoplasty dorsal lengths; tip projection ratios; and nasolabial, nasofrontal, and nasofacial angles. Relative percent changes for each patient between pre- and post-rhinoplasty measurements were compared between transgender and cisgender females using descriptive statistics.

[RESULTS] Twenty-five transgender patients met the inclusion criteria; 19 answered the survey with 12 very satisfied, 7 satisfied, and 0 less satisfied patients. The median age of surveyed patients was 35, and 42.1% identified as Hispanic. Between very satisfied and satisfied patients, median relative percent changes in dorsal length (-1.2% vs 5.7%, = .043), tip projection ratio (2.4% vs 8.1%, = .038), and nasolabial angle (-2.5% vs 9.7%, = .026) significantly differed; median relative changes in nasofrontal angles (4.2% vs -0.6%, = .071) and nasofacial angles (-0.7% vs -3.6%, = .703) were insignificantly different. Satisfied transgender patients and cisgender patients (n = 5) had significant differences in median relative changes in dorsal length (5.7% vs 0.7%, = .047), tip projection ratio (8.1% vs -3.5%, = .033), and nasolabial angles (9.7% vs -5.4%, = .042). Very satisfied transgender and cisgender females had no significant differences in relative metric changes.

[CONCLUSIONS] Very satisfied transgender patients had decreases in dorsal length, smaller increases in tip projection ratio, and decreases in the nasolabial angle compared with satisfied patients. These data can help focus feminizing rhinoplasty approaches to maximize satisfaction. Further, very satisfied transgender patients had similar changes as cisgender females, reaffirming the utility of applying cisgender female rhinoplasty considerations to feminizing rhinoplasty.