A Systematic Review of Technique, Satisfaction, and Complications of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Rhinoplasty.
Abstract
[OBJECTIVE] Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is a new dermal transplant replacement material prepared from allogeneic or xenograft skin through bioengineering technology. This is provided for patients who are unwilling to kill part of their autologous cartilage or autologous dermal tissue and require rhinoplasty and improvement in the appearance of the nasal tip. This systematic review aims to introduce the main techniques of ADM for rhinoplasty and related patient satisfaction and complications to further guide doctors.
[METHODS] Systematic reviews were conducted in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. The authors searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library using appropriate keywords. Data collected for each study included patient satisfaction and complications in addition to relevant technology.
[RESULTS] After full-text screening of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 10 studies were included, with a total of 324 patients receiving ADM with different transplantation methods. Primary rhinoplasty or secondary rhinoplasty study for dorsal ridge augmentation, smooth contour irregularities, autograft camouflage including tip grafts. The incidence of dorsal implant distortion was 0.72% in patients. The incidence of deviation was 2.17% in patients. The incidence of mild edema was 5.17% in patients. The incidence of partial resorption was 10.87% in patients. The incidence of significant resorption was 13.04% in patients. The incidence of seroma was 0.72% in patients. The incidence of partial prolapse was 0.72% in patients. The incidence of overcorrection and reoperation was 0.72% in patients. The incidence of erythema was 0.72% in patients. The incidence of undercorrection was 0.72% in patients. The incidence of infection was 0.72% in patients. The incidence of high-lying implants was 1.45% in patients.
[CONCLUSION] The current research results show that ADM is long-term effective in improving nasal dorsum enhancement, nasal contour deformity, and nasal tip appearance, with high patient satisfaction and low overall complication rate. Overcorrection should be considered during surgery to deal with postoperative partial absorption.
[METHODS] Systematic reviews were conducted in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. The authors searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library using appropriate keywords. Data collected for each study included patient satisfaction and complications in addition to relevant technology.
[RESULTS] After full-text screening of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 10 studies were included, with a total of 324 patients receiving ADM with different transplantation methods. Primary rhinoplasty or secondary rhinoplasty study for dorsal ridge augmentation, smooth contour irregularities, autograft camouflage including tip grafts. The incidence of dorsal implant distortion was 0.72% in patients. The incidence of deviation was 2.17% in patients. The incidence of mild edema was 5.17% in patients. The incidence of partial resorption was 10.87% in patients. The incidence of significant resorption was 13.04% in patients. The incidence of seroma was 0.72% in patients. The incidence of partial prolapse was 0.72% in patients. The incidence of overcorrection and reoperation was 0.72% in patients. The incidence of erythema was 0.72% in patients. The incidence of undercorrection was 0.72% in patients. The incidence of infection was 0.72% in patients. The incidence of high-lying implants was 1.45% in patients.
[CONCLUSION] The current research results show that ADM is long-term effective in improving nasal dorsum enhancement, nasal contour deformity, and nasal tip appearance, with high patient satisfaction and low overall complication rate. Overcorrection should be considered during surgery to deal with postoperative partial absorption.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | rhinoplasty
|
코성형술 | dict | 5 | |
| 재료 | adm
|
무세포진피기질 | dict | 4 | |
| 해부 | nasal tip
|
코끝 | dict | 2 | |
| 재료 | acellular dermal matrix
|
무세포진피기질 | dict | 2 | |
| 해부 | cartilage
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | dorsal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | smooth
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | grafts
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | tip
|
코끝 | dict | 1 | |
| 해부 | nasal dorsum
|
콧등 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | dermal transplant
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | dorsal implant
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | edema
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | erythema
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | seroma
|
장액종 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | infection
|
감염 | dict | 1 | |
| 약물 | [OBJECTIVE] Acellular dermal matrix
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | edema
|
C0013604
Edema
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | overcorrection
|
C0871026
Overcorrection (psychologic)
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | erythema
|
C0041834
Erythema
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | undercorrection
|
C5421360
Undercorrection
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | xenograft skin
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | dermal tissue
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patient
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | nasal
|
scispacy | 1 |
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Penetrating globe injury following periocular hyaluronic acid filler injection: A case report.
- Aesthetically ideal noses created using a single artificial intelligence model: Validating literature and exploring ethnic differences.
- Septocolumellar strut technique: Tip stability and aesthetic outcomes in rhinoplasty.
- Implications of Dermatologic Disorders in Facial Cosmetic Surgery: A Systematic Review.