National Trends of Otolaryngology Involvement in Cleft Surgical Management over 10-Years.
Abstract
[OBJECTIVE] Surgical management of cleft lip/palate and cleft rhinoplasty have historically been performed by plastic surgeons. No study has addressed temporal trends in cleft-associated surgeries. This study assesses trends in cleft surgical management and complications in a national database.
[METHODS] Cross-sectional analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database from 2012 to 2021. Patients receiving cleft lip and/or palate repair were isolated using CPT codes. A subset receiving cleft rhinoplasty was also analyzed. The yearly proportion of otolaryngologists compared to general plastic surgeons performing surgeries was noted. Regression analysis was used to identify trends and predictors of management by OHNS.
[RESULTS] We identified 46,618 cases of cleft repair, of which 15.6% (N = 7,255) underwent repair with otolaryngology. On univariate Pearson correlation analysis, neither cleft rhinoplasties performed by OHNS over time (R = 0.371, 95% CI -0.337 to 0.811, p = 0.2907) nor all cases (R = -0.26, -0.76 to 0.44, p = 0.465) exhibited a significant change. On multivariable regression, the operative year was not associated with being treated by otolaryngology (p = 0.826) for all cleft cases but was associated with such in cleft rhinoplasties (OR 1.04, 1.01-1.08, p = 0.024). On multivariable analysis, the operative year was correlated with a higher rate of complications overall (OR 1.04, 1.01-1.07, p = 0.002). Surgeon specialty was not associated with complication rates.
[CONCLUSIONS] In the last 10 years, no change in the proportion of cleft lip/palate repair performed by OHNS was observed. Otolaryngologists are performing more cleft rhinoplasty but at a marginal rate. Otolaryngologists also manage more complex patients with multiple comorbidities compared to their colleagues. Complication rates have increased overall regardless of surgeon specialty, warranting further investigation.
[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] 3 Laryngoscope, 134:671-677, 2024.
[METHODS] Cross-sectional analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database from 2012 to 2021. Patients receiving cleft lip and/or palate repair were isolated using CPT codes. A subset receiving cleft rhinoplasty was also analyzed. The yearly proportion of otolaryngologists compared to general plastic surgeons performing surgeries was noted. Regression analysis was used to identify trends and predictors of management by OHNS.
[RESULTS] We identified 46,618 cases of cleft repair, of which 15.6% (N = 7,255) underwent repair with otolaryngology. On univariate Pearson correlation analysis, neither cleft rhinoplasties performed by OHNS over time (R = 0.371, 95% CI -0.337 to 0.811, p = 0.2907) nor all cases (R = -0.26, -0.76 to 0.44, p = 0.465) exhibited a significant change. On multivariable regression, the operative year was not associated with being treated by otolaryngology (p = 0.826) for all cleft cases but was associated with such in cleft rhinoplasties (OR 1.04, 1.01-1.08, p = 0.024). On multivariable analysis, the operative year was correlated with a higher rate of complications overall (OR 1.04, 1.01-1.07, p = 0.002). Surgeon specialty was not associated with complication rates.
[CONCLUSIONS] In the last 10 years, no change in the proportion of cleft lip/palate repair performed by OHNS was observed. Otolaryngologists are performing more cleft rhinoplasty but at a marginal rate. Otolaryngologists also manage more complex patients with multiple comorbidities compared to their colleagues. Complication rates have increased overall regardless of surgeon specialty, warranting further investigation.
[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] 3 Laryngoscope, 134:671-677, 2024.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | rhinoplasty
|
코성형술 | dict | 3 | |
| 해부 | lip
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | lip/palate
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | CPT
|
C0006938
captopril
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 약물 | [OBJECTIVE]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [RESULTS]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | cleft lip/palate
|
C0158646
Cleft palate with cleft lip
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | cleft rhinoplasty
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | cleft-associated
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | cleft lip
|
C0008924
Cleft upper lip
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | palate
|
C0700374
Palate
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | cleft repair
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | cleft rhinoplasties
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | cleft
|
C0205242
Cleaved
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | cleft lip/palate repair
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | lip/palate
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | Patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | 46,618
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Humans; Child; Cleft Lip; Cleft Palate; Cross-Sectional Studies; Nose; Rhinoplasty; Otolaryngology
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Aesthetically ideal noses created using a single artificial intelligence model: Validating literature and exploring ethnic differences.
- Septocolumellar strut technique: Tip stability and aesthetic outcomes in rhinoplasty.
- Implications of Dermatologic Disorders in Facial Cosmetic Surgery: A Systematic Review.
- Factors on Quality of Life Improvement in Septorhinoplasty: Prospective Evaluation Using the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 and Its Minimally Important Difference.