Factors Affecting the Surgical Outcome in Nasal Septal Perforation Repair.
Abstract
[OBJECTIVE] Nasal septal perforation (NSP) repair is challenging surgery considered in patients with symptomatic NSP intractable to conservative treatments. This study aimed to assess the success rate and identify factors affecting the surgical outcome of NSP by analyzing consecutive series of NSP repairs by a single surgeon.
[METHODS] We enrolled 84 patients diagnosed with NSP and who underwent surgical repair of NSP by a single surgeon (Y.J.J.) between November 2007 and July 2022. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed regarding variables involving preoperative symptoms, rhinologic history, etiology, surgical techniques, and the outcome of surgery. In addition, features of NSP were objectively evaluated using computed tomography scans.
[RESULTS] The overall success rate of NSP repair was 64.3% (54 of 84). Nasal obstruction (79.8%), crusting (34.5%), and epistaxis (27.4%) were frequent preoperative symptoms. Iatrogenic injury from previous nasal surgery (70.2%) was the most common cause. The average size of NSP on preoperative CT was 9.53 ± 6.68 mm. Patients with incomplete NSP closure had significantly larger perforations (12.21 ± 7.92 mm) than those with successful closure (8.04 ± 5.41 mm) preoperatively ( = .005). Patients with smoking history (OR = 2.971, 95% CI 1.170-7.548, = .020) and NSP repair with combined rhinoplasty (OR = 3.811, 95% CI 1.401-10.370, = .007) were more likely to experience incomplete closure. Patients whose perforations were reinforced with interposition graft were more likely to result in successful repair (OR = 6.752, 95% CI 2.496-18.262, < .001). The bilaterality of mucosal flap coverage, surgical approach, types of mucosal flap and interposition graft, perforation shape, mucosal thickness around perforation, and distance from the nasal floor were not significantly related to the surgical outcome.
[CONCLUSIONS] Significant factors affecting the outcome of NSP repair were patient's smoking status, combined rhinoplasty, application of interposition graft, and perforation size.
[METHODS] We enrolled 84 patients diagnosed with NSP and who underwent surgical repair of NSP by a single surgeon (Y.J.J.) between November 2007 and July 2022. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed regarding variables involving preoperative symptoms, rhinologic history, etiology, surgical techniques, and the outcome of surgery. In addition, features of NSP were objectively evaluated using computed tomography scans.
[RESULTS] The overall success rate of NSP repair was 64.3% (54 of 84). Nasal obstruction (79.8%), crusting (34.5%), and epistaxis (27.4%) were frequent preoperative symptoms. Iatrogenic injury from previous nasal surgery (70.2%) was the most common cause. The average size of NSP on preoperative CT was 9.53 ± 6.68 mm. Patients with incomplete NSP closure had significantly larger perforations (12.21 ± 7.92 mm) than those with successful closure (8.04 ± 5.41 mm) preoperatively ( = .005). Patients with smoking history (OR = 2.971, 95% CI 1.170-7.548, = .020) and NSP repair with combined rhinoplasty (OR = 3.811, 95% CI 1.401-10.370, = .007) were more likely to experience incomplete closure. Patients whose perforations were reinforced with interposition graft were more likely to result in successful repair (OR = 6.752, 95% CI 2.496-18.262, < .001). The bilaterality of mucosal flap coverage, surgical approach, types of mucosal flap and interposition graft, perforation shape, mucosal thickness around perforation, and distance from the nasal floor were not significantly related to the surgical outcome.
[CONCLUSIONS] Significant factors affecting the outcome of NSP repair were patient's smoking status, combined rhinoplasty, application of interposition graft, and perforation size.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | rhinoplasty
|
코성형술 | dict | 2 | |
| 시술 | flap
|
피판재건술 | dict | 2 | |
| 시술 | nasal surgery
|
코성형술 | dict | 1 | |
| 해부 | NSP
→ Nasal septal perforation
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | Nasal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | graft
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | mucosal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | Nasal Septal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | mucosal flap
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | smoking
|
C0037369
Smoking
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 약물 | [OBJECTIVE] Nasal septal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | 9.53
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | 8.04
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | CI 1.170-7.548
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | CI 1.401-10.370
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | 6.752
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | CI 2.496-
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS] Significant factors
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | Nasal Septal Perforation
|
C0235761
Perforation of nasal septum
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | Nasal obstruction
|
C0027429
Nasal obstruction present finding
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | crusting
|
C0205204
Scab
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | epistaxis
|
C0014591
Epistaxis
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | perforations
|
C0549099
Perforation (observation)
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | perforation
|
C0549099
Perforation (observation)
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | nasal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | nasal floor
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patient
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Humans; Nasal Septal Perforation; Retrospective Studies; Rhinoplasty; Nasal Septum; Treatment Outcome
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Aesthetically ideal noses created using a single artificial intelligence model: Validating literature and exploring ethnic differences.
- Septocolumellar strut technique: Tip stability and aesthetic outcomes in rhinoplasty.
- Implications of Dermatologic Disorders in Facial Cosmetic Surgery: A Systematic Review.
- From Palliation After Angiosarcoma Resection to Totally Autologous Aesthetic Breast Reconstruction Combining Kiss Latissimus Dorsi Flap and Contralateral Breast Sharing Internal Mammary Artery Perforator Flap: A Case Report.