A Prospective Study to Examine Responsiveness and Minimally Important Differences (MIDs) for the CLEFT-Q Scales Following Three Cleft-Specific Operations.

The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association 2023 Vol.60(4) p. 413-420

Miroshnychenko A, Rae C, Wong Riff K, Forrest CR, Goodacre T, Swan MC, Slator R, Goldstein J, Thoma A, Harman K, Klassen A

관련 도메인

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine internal responsiveness and estimate minimally important differences (MIDs) for CLEFT-Q scales. In this prospective cohort study, participants completed the CLEFT-Q appearance and health-related quality of life (HRQL) scales before and six months after cleft-related surgery. Seven cleft centres in Canada, USA and UK participated. Patients were ages 8-29 years with CL/P. Patients underwent rhinoplasty, orthognathic or cleft lip scar revision surgery. Internal responsiveness was examined using Cohen's d effect sizes (ESs) based on the following interpretation: 0.20-0.49 small, 0.50-0.79 moderate and ≥ 0.80 large. MIDs were estimated using two distribution-based approaches. Participants had a rhinoplasty (n = 31), orthognathic (n = 21) or cleft lip scar revision (n = 18) surgery. Most participants were males (56%) and aged 8-11 years (41%). Following rhinoplasty, ESs were larger for the nose (0.92, p = 0.001) and nostrils (0.94, p < 0.001) scales than for the face scale (0.51, p = 0.003). MIDs ranged between 6.2-10.4. For orthognathic surgery, larger ES was observed for the jaws scale (1.80, p < 0.001) compared with the teeth (1.16, p < 0.001), face (1.15, p = 0.001) and lips (0.94, p < 0.001) scales. MIDs ranged between 5.9-14.4. In the cleft lip scar revision sample, the largest ES was observed for the nose scale (0.76, p = 0.03), followed by lips (0.58, p = 0.009) and cleft lip scar (0.50, p = 0.043) scales. MIDs ranged between 6.4-12.3. CLEFT-Q detected change in key outcomes for three cleft-specific surgeries, providing evidence of its responsiveness. Estimated MIDs will aid in interpreting this PROM.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 rhinoplasty 코성형술 dict 3
시술 scar revision 흉터교정술 dict 3
시술 orthognathic surgery 안면윤곽술 dict 1
해부 ESs → effect sizes scispacy 1
해부 nose scispacy 1
해부 jaws scispacy 1
해부 teeth scispacy 1
해부 lips scispacy 1
해부 MIDs → Minimally Important Differences scispacy 1
합병증 lip scar scispacy 1
질환 orthognathic or cleft lip scar scispacy 1
질환 cleft lip scar scispacy 1
질환 PROM scispacy 1
질환 MIDs → Minimally Important Differences scispacy 1
기타 participants scispacy 1
기타 Patients scispacy 1
기타 CL/P. scispacy 1
기타 nostrils scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Male; Humans; Female; Cleft Lip; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Cicatrix; Lip

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문