Utilizing Age of Menarche to Optimize Pediatric Rhinoplasty.

[BACKGROUND/PURPOSE] Pediatric septorhinoplasty has sparked controversial debate amongst craniofacial surgeons, particularly due to its potential growth disturbances of the face and nose. The purpose of this study is (1) to conduct a systematic literature review that explores unique considerations and limitations associated with performing rhinoplasty in the pediatric population; (2) to discuss objective indicators for determining craniofacial skeleton maturation; (3) to perform a case series to further understand whether the age of menarche serves as a good proxy for estimating the time of facial growth maturation, and by extension, whether a post-menarchal patient is a suitable candidate for rhinoplasty.

[METHODS] Systematic literature review was performed in order to assess unique considerations and limitations of pediatric rhinoplasty. Retrospective chart review and anthropometric (9 linear, 3 angular, 6 indices) measurements were performed for ten pediatric female patients who underwent open septo-rhinoplasty. Follow-up times ranged from 66 to 103 weeks. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts according to age at the time of menarche. Cohort 1 consisted of patients who had undergone menses for longer than 2 years at the time of rhinoplasty, whereas Cohort 2 comprised of patients who either had menses within 2 years of rhinoplasty or did not have menses at the time of rhinoplasty. Data included demographic factors, procedural variables, revision surgeries, and complications. Measurements were conducted using VECTRA software (Canfield Scientific, Parsippany, NJ). Differences in measurements between the 2 postoperative timepoints were compared.

[RESULTS] Literature review yielded 17 articles, which had conflicting opinions regarding pediatric rhinoplasty and ultimately, highlighting the need for a more objective tool for guiding the decision to perform rhinoplasty.Patients in Cohort 1 had minimal deviations in measurements over time, within the exception of an increase in nasal tip projection and a decrease in nasolabial angle and facial width. Patients in Cohort 2 had decreases in facial height, upper facial height, nasal tip angle, and nasofrontal angle. Nasolabial angle decreased for both cohorts. Of the ten patients, 1 in Cohort 2 underwent revision rhinoplasty.

[CONCLUSIONS] Our case series suggests that anthropometric measurements remain relatively more stable for patients who have undergone menses for more than 2 years, compared to those who have not. Although this study has limitations, further investigation is warranted in order to determine whether age of menarche may serve as a useful tool for craniofacial surgeons in guiding the decision to perform rhinoplasty.