Rhinoplasty: French validation of the MiRa scale.
Abstract
[AIMS] The aim of this study was to translate the MiRa scale into French and validate its use for French-speaking surgeons.
[MATERIAL AND METHODS] ISPOR and WHO recommendations were used to carry out the translation process from English to French in five steps. The MiRa scale is a validated analysis scale of nasal dysmorphoses. Few tools are available in French for French-speaking surgeons. ISPOR and WHO recommendations were used to complete the five-step translation process from English into French. To assess the reliability of the MiRa scale-French version, we statistically compared intra-observer repeatability (comparison of scores obtained when one observer assessed each patient twice at a one-month interval) and inter-observer repeatability (comparison of scores obtained when 2 observers assessed the same patient) using the Wilcoxon test and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (α=5%).
[OBJECTIVES] Our goal was to obtain a translation of the idea or concept rather than a literal translation to enable good intra- and inter-observer repeatability.
[RESULTS] Each step allowed us to make changes gradually working towards a conceptual translation equivalent to the original version.
[CONCLUSION] The MiRa scale is the only aesthetic analysis scale validated in the literature for nasal dysmorphoses. The combined use of two sets of translation recommendations, with a five-step translation-back-translation process, made it possible to obtain a French version perfectly in line with the original. This version is usable by French-speakers.
[MATERIAL AND METHODS] ISPOR and WHO recommendations were used to carry out the translation process from English to French in five steps. The MiRa scale is a validated analysis scale of nasal dysmorphoses. Few tools are available in French for French-speaking surgeons. ISPOR and WHO recommendations were used to complete the five-step translation process from English into French. To assess the reliability of the MiRa scale-French version, we statistically compared intra-observer repeatability (comparison of scores obtained when one observer assessed each patient twice at a one-month interval) and inter-observer repeatability (comparison of scores obtained when 2 observers assessed the same patient) using the Wilcoxon test and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (α=5%).
[OBJECTIVES] Our goal was to obtain a translation of the idea or concept rather than a literal translation to enable good intra- and inter-observer repeatability.
[RESULTS] Each step allowed us to make changes gradually working towards a conceptual translation equivalent to the original version.
[CONCLUSION] The MiRa scale is the only aesthetic analysis scale validated in the literature for nasal dysmorphoses. The combined use of two sets of translation recommendations, with a five-step translation-back-translation process, made it possible to obtain a French version perfectly in line with the original. This version is usable by French-speakers.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | rhinoplasty
|
코성형술 | dict | 1 | |
| 해부 | line
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | nasal dysmorphoses
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [MATERIAL AND
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [OBJECTIVES]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patient
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Humans; Nose; Observer Variation; Rhinoplasty; Translations; Treatment Outcome
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Aesthetically ideal noses created using a single artificial intelligence model: Validating literature and exploring ethnic differences.
- Septocolumellar strut technique: Tip stability and aesthetic outcomes in rhinoplasty.
- Implications of Dermatologic Disorders in Facial Cosmetic Surgery: A Systematic Review.
- Factors on Quality of Life Improvement in Septorhinoplasty: Prospective Evaluation Using the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 and Its Minimally Important Difference.