Functional and Aesthetic Factors Associated with Revision of Rhinoplasty.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Surgical revision rate of rhinoplasty is from 5% to 15% in literature. The aims of our study were to define the rate and the predictive factors for surgical revision of rhinoplasty.
[METHODS] We have realized a single-center case/control study including 62 patients who underwent surgical revision among 732 patients who underwent closed rhinoplasty between 2005 and 2015. Data of each rhinoplasty were collected from medical records and photographs. Statistical analyses were used.
[RESULTS] The surgical revision rate was 8.6%. After multivariate analysis, 4 factors were statistically significant and independently associated with surgical revision: "preexisting respiratory functional disorder" [odds ratio OR = 3.30; 95% CI (1.47-7.76); = 0.004], "wide nasal bone and side walls" [OR = 3.94; 95% CI (1.49-11.25); = 0.007], "deviated nasal bone and side walls" [OR = 2.68; 95% CI [1.14-6.58]; = 0.02] and the use of camouflage grafts [OR = 0.26; 95% CI [0.07-0.89]; = 0.04].
[CONCLUSIONS] Closed rhinoplasties have similar revision rate to open techniques. Revision surgeries are justified by functional or aesthetic disorders. The interests of this study are to better inform patients and to adapt operative management. We provide here some recommendations with focus on the keys to successful rhinoplasty surgery.
[METHODS] We have realized a single-center case/control study including 62 patients who underwent surgical revision among 732 patients who underwent closed rhinoplasty between 2005 and 2015. Data of each rhinoplasty were collected from medical records and photographs. Statistical analyses were used.
[RESULTS] The surgical revision rate was 8.6%. After multivariate analysis, 4 factors were statistically significant and independently associated with surgical revision: "preexisting respiratory functional disorder" [odds ratio OR = 3.30; 95% CI (1.47-7.76); = 0.004], "wide nasal bone and side walls" [OR = 3.94; 95% CI (1.49-11.25); = 0.007], "deviated nasal bone and side walls" [OR = 2.68; 95% CI [1.14-6.58]; = 0.02] and the use of camouflage grafts [OR = 0.26; 95% CI [0.07-0.89]; = 0.04].
[CONCLUSIONS] Closed rhinoplasties have similar revision rate to open techniques. Revision surgeries are justified by functional or aesthetic disorders. The interests of this study are to better inform patients and to adapt operative management. We provide here some recommendations with focus on the keys to successful rhinoplasty surgery.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | rhinoplasty
|
코성형술 | dict | 6 | |
| 해부 | grafts
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [OR =
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | CI [1.14-6.58
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS] Closed rhinoplasties
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기법 | closed rhinoplasty
|
폐쇄형 접근법 | dict | 1 | |
| 질환 | respiratory functional disorder
|
C1260922
Abnormal breathing
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | nasal bone
|
scispacy | 1 |
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Aesthetically ideal noses created using a single artificial intelligence model: Validating literature and exploring ethnic differences.
- Septocolumellar strut technique: Tip stability and aesthetic outcomes in rhinoplasty.
- Implications of Dermatologic Disorders in Facial Cosmetic Surgery: A Systematic Review.
- Factors on Quality of Life Improvement in Septorhinoplasty: Prospective Evaluation Using the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 and Its Minimally Important Difference.