Managing the Difficult Soft Tissue Envelope in Facial and Rhinoplasty Surgery.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] The nasal soft tissue envelope affects the final rhinoplasty result, and can limit the expected improvement. Currently, no dependable and objective test exists to measure the thickness of the nasal skin and underlying soft tissue.
[OBJECTIVES] This paper presents a simple, yet reliable method to determine the thickness of the soft tissue envelope. An algorithm is presented for treatment of the dermis and/or soft tissue apart from surgery of the underlying osseocartilaginous structures.
[METHODS] Seventy-five patients presenting for primary rhinoplasty underwent visual and ultrasound assessment of their nasal soft tissue envelope. At preoperative evaluation, the Obagi "skin pinch test" was used to assess the thickness of the nasolabial fold and whether or not the skin was oily. Patients were classified based on the pinch thickness. At time of surgery prior to injection of local anesthesia, ultrasonic assessment was done at the nasolabial fold, keystone junction, supratip, and tip to measure the thickness of the nasal dermis and underlying soft tissue.
[RESULTS] Patients determined to have thin, normal, and thick skin by the "skin pinch test" were found to have a nasolabial fold dermal thickness with an average of 0.7 mm (0.4-1.2 mm), 1.1 mm (0.8-1.8 mm), and 1.4 mm (0.7-2.0 mm). Patients determined to have thin, normal, and thick skin were found to have a dermal thickness at the keystone junction with an average of 0.3 mm (0.2-0.4 mm), 0.5 mm (0.3-1.1 mm), and 0.9 mm (0.6-1.2 mm), respectively. This difference in thickness also translated to the supratip and tip areas measured. However, all areas were also affected by the oiliness of the skin. Soft tissue thickness (SMAS and muscle) underlying the dermis was variable. Patients of non-Caucasian background were more likely to have a thicker soft tissue layer.
[CONCLUSIONS] The "skin pinch test" is an easy and reliable way for the surgeon to evaluate the thickness of the nasal soft tissue envelope. The rhinoplasty surgeon can make decisions pre- and postoperatively to treat patients with difficult soft tissue envelopes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4.
[OBJECTIVES] This paper presents a simple, yet reliable method to determine the thickness of the soft tissue envelope. An algorithm is presented for treatment of the dermis and/or soft tissue apart from surgery of the underlying osseocartilaginous structures.
[METHODS] Seventy-five patients presenting for primary rhinoplasty underwent visual and ultrasound assessment of their nasal soft tissue envelope. At preoperative evaluation, the Obagi "skin pinch test" was used to assess the thickness of the nasolabial fold and whether or not the skin was oily. Patients were classified based on the pinch thickness. At time of surgery prior to injection of local anesthesia, ultrasonic assessment was done at the nasolabial fold, keystone junction, supratip, and tip to measure the thickness of the nasal dermis and underlying soft tissue.
[RESULTS] Patients determined to have thin, normal, and thick skin by the "skin pinch test" were found to have a nasolabial fold dermal thickness with an average of 0.7 mm (0.4-1.2 mm), 1.1 mm (0.8-1.8 mm), and 1.4 mm (0.7-2.0 mm). Patients determined to have thin, normal, and thick skin were found to have a dermal thickness at the keystone junction with an average of 0.3 mm (0.2-0.4 mm), 0.5 mm (0.3-1.1 mm), and 0.9 mm (0.6-1.2 mm), respectively. This difference in thickness also translated to the supratip and tip areas measured. However, all areas were also affected by the oiliness of the skin. Soft tissue thickness (SMAS and muscle) underlying the dermis was variable. Patients of non-Caucasian background were more likely to have a thicker soft tissue layer.
[CONCLUSIONS] The "skin pinch test" is an easy and reliable way for the surgeon to evaluate the thickness of the nasal soft tissue envelope. The rhinoplasty surgeon can make decisions pre- and postoperatively to treat patients with difficult soft tissue envelopes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | rhinoplasty
|
코성형술 | dict | 4 | |
| 해부 | tip
|
코끝 | dict | 2 | |
| 해부 | Soft Tissue
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | dermis
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | skin
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | supratip
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | dermal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | muscle
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | soft tissue layer
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | smas
|
표재성근건막계 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | nasal soft
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | nasolabial
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND] The
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [OBJECTIVES]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | oiliness
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | supratip
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | nasal soft tissue envelope
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | nasal skin
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | Obagi
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | nasal dermis
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Adult; Algorithms; Anatomic Landmarks; Decision Support Techniques; Esthetics; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Muscle, Skeletal; Nasolabial Fold; Nose; Photography; Physical Examination; Predictive Value of Tests; Racial Groups; Reproducibility of Results; Rhinoplasty; Skin; Subcutaneous Tissue; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography; Visual Perception; Young Adult
📑 인용 관계
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Aesthetically ideal noses created using a single artificial intelligence model: Validating literature and exploring ethnic differences.
- Septocolumellar strut technique: Tip stability and aesthetic outcomes in rhinoplasty.
- Implications of Dermatologic Disorders in Facial Cosmetic Surgery: A Systematic Review.
- IN-HUMAN FEASIBILITY AND SAFETY OF SUBRETINAL DRUG INJECTION THROUGH ATTACHED RETINA USING A ROBOTIC COMANIPULATION SYSTEM.