Nasal or canthal-alar parentheses: A study of the facial base of the nose.
Abstract
[OBJECTIVES] The facial implantation of the osseous nasal pyramid corresponds to the piriform aperture, the shape of which is projected on the facial skin in the form of bracket-shaped parentheses. The objective of this study was to compare inter-parenthesis width with subjective visibility on frontal photographs.
[MATERIAL AND METHODS] The "patient" group came from a retrospective cohort of photographs taken ahead of septorhinoplasty. The "model" group photographs were collected from the Web or magazines. Nasal parentheses were first judged subjectively as frank or faint. Then, independently, parenthesis width was measured by computer in pixels and converted into millimeters by iris-dependent calibration. Inter-parenthesis width was compared statistically with the frank/faint assessment, according to gender and group.
[RESULTS] A total of 113 photographs were included: 46 patients (19 women, 27 men) and 67 models (43 women, 24 men). Sixty-seven of the 113 nasal parentheses appeared frank (59.3%), more frequently in men than women (70.6% vs 50.0%, P=0.02) and in patients than models (69.6% vs 52.2%, P=0.06). Inter-parenthesis width was significantly greater in frank than faint presentations (34.9±3.5mm vs 30.7±3.4mm, P<0.0001), in men than women (35.2±4.1mm vs 31.5±3.1mm, P<0.0001), and in patients than models (34.9±4.0mm vs 32.0±3.6mm, P<0.0001).
[CONCLUSION] Frank nasal parentheses correspond to wider facial implantation of the nose.
[MATERIAL AND METHODS] The "patient" group came from a retrospective cohort of photographs taken ahead of septorhinoplasty. The "model" group photographs were collected from the Web or magazines. Nasal parentheses were first judged subjectively as frank or faint. Then, independently, parenthesis width was measured by computer in pixels and converted into millimeters by iris-dependent calibration. Inter-parenthesis width was compared statistically with the frank/faint assessment, according to gender and group.
[RESULTS] A total of 113 photographs were included: 46 patients (19 women, 27 men) and 67 models (43 women, 24 men). Sixty-seven of the 113 nasal parentheses appeared frank (59.3%), more frequently in men than women (70.6% vs 50.0%, P=0.02) and in patients than models (69.6% vs 52.2%, P=0.06). Inter-parenthesis width was significantly greater in frank than faint presentations (34.9±3.5mm vs 30.7±3.4mm, P<0.0001), in men than women (35.2±4.1mm vs 31.5±3.1mm, P<0.0001), and in patients than models (34.9±4.0mm vs 32.0±3.6mm, P<0.0001).
[CONCLUSION] Frank nasal parentheses correspond to wider facial implantation of the nose.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | septorhinoplasty
|
코성형술 | dict | 1 | |
| 해부 | alar
|
콧방울 | dict | 1 | |
| 해부 | skin
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | Nasal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | facial base
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | nose
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [OBJECTIVES] The
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [MATERIAL AND
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [RESULTS] A
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSION] Frank nasal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | piriform
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | osseous nasal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | frontal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | women
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | men
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Anatomic Landmarks; Cohort Studies; Face; Female; Humans; Male; Nose; Photography; Retrospective Studies; Sex Characteristics
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Aesthetically ideal noses created using a single artificial intelligence model: Validating literature and exploring ethnic differences.
- Septocolumellar strut technique: Tip stability and aesthetic outcomes in rhinoplasty.
- Implications of Dermatologic Disorders in Facial Cosmetic Surgery: A Systematic Review.
- Factors on Quality of Life Improvement in Septorhinoplasty: Prospective Evaluation Using the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 and Its Minimally Important Difference.