Chin Microgenia: A Clinical Comparative Study.

Aesthetic plastic surgery 2015 Vol.39(5) p. 651-8

Bertossi D, Galzignato PF, Albanese M, Botti C, Botti G, Nocini PF

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] The aesthetic relevance of the chin and its relatively simple correction through different approaches make genioplasty one of the most performed aesthetic procedures of the face. Sliding genioplasty is extremely rewarding, particularly when performed as an adjunction to rhinoplasty, rhytidectomy, or jaw surgery. In the scientific literature, many different surgical techniques are described, but the biological implications and the economical impact can shape the surgeon's decision on which can be the best treatment: surgical correction with osteotomy, chin implants, or with fillers.

[OBJECTIVE] The authors propose a decision making protocol for correcting chin microgenia based on a revision of 345 treated cases.

[METHODS] A retrospective review of 345 cases of chin microgenia was undertaken to understand the proper preoperative assessment and therapeutic planning. A total of 135 patients were treated with surgical sliding genioplasty (group A): 60 patients (group B) have been grafted with alloplastic implants and the remaining 150 patients (group C) with hyaluronic acid. We recorded clinical indications, complications, and long-term aesthetic results at 3-year follow-up.

[RESULTS] The analysis of the results based on the entity of the chin's sagittal defect, the chin soft-tissue thickness, the patient's age, and self-judgment allows for simplified treatment planning for sagittal chin deformities showing a greater predictability and a more stable long-term aesthetic result regarding sliding genioplasty compared to alloplastic implant placement and fillers.

[CONCLUSIONS] Our proposal for a simple and versatile protocol of chin microgenia aims to simplify the therapeutic indications for a predictable and a stable long-term aesthetic result.

[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II] This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 sliding genioplasty 턱끝성형술 dict 3
시술 rhinoplasty 코성형술 dict 1
시술 rhytidectomy 안면거상술 dict 1
시술 genioplasty 턱끝성형술 dict 1
해부 jaw scispacy 1
해부 chin soft-tissue scispacy 1
합병증 chin scispacy 1
재료 hyaluronic acid 히알루론산 dict 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] scispacy 1
약물 [OBJECTIVE] scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] scispacy 1
질환 microgenia C0341030
Microgenia
scispacy 1
질환 chin deformities scispacy 1
질환 chin scispacy 1
질환 fillers scispacy 1
질환 chin microgenia based scispacy 1
질환 chin microgenia scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 patient scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Adolescent; Adult; Chin; Cohort Studies; Esthetics; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Genioplasty; Humans; Hyaluronic Acid; Male; Middle Aged; Osteotomy; Patient Satisfaction; Prostheses and Implants; Prosthesis Implantation; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Viscosupplements; Young Adult

📑 인용 관계

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문