Compression Dressing versus Noncompressive Transparent Eye Shield after Ptosis Surgery.

[BACKGROUND] We aimed to investigate the effect of compression dressing on edema, ecchymosis, pain, and ocular surface irritation after ptosis surgery.

[METHODS] After ptosis correction [anterior levator reinsertion (and resection) (ALR), if necessary additional blepharoplasty], the eye was randomized for compression dressing or transparent eye shield. Edema and ecchymosis were scored on a four-point rating scale by a blinded observer 1 day (D1), 1 week (D7), and 8 weeks (D56) after surgery; the same was done for scar formation regarding redness and bulging at D7 and D56. Aesthetic outcome was ranked by patient and blinded observer using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Score at D1, D7, and D56. Postoperative pain was scored using a visual analogue scale (0 to 10) at D1. Impairment after surgery by dressing or eye shield was evaluated at D1.

[RESULTS] Ecchymosis, edema, scar formation, and aesthetic outcome ranked by the patient and blinded observer did not differ between the groups with compression dressing and eye shield at any day of follow-up ( > 0.05). Postoperative pain and impairment were the same in both groups ( > 0.05). One case of corneal erosion occurred in the group with compression dressing at D1 ( = 0.342). At D7, corneal staining was increased in the group without compression dressing ( = 0.930).

[CONCLUSIONS] Compression dressing after ALR does not reduce ecchymosis, edema, or postoperative pain and has no effect on early scar formation or aesthetic results. To prevent corneal erosion caused by the dressing, it can be omitted after ALR without inferiority for the early postoperative results.