Histologic Comparison of Upper Blepharoplasty Skin Excision Using Scalpel Incision Versus Microdissection Electrocautery Needle Tip Versus Continuous Wave CO2 Laser.

[BACKGROUND] The various techniques of upper blepharoplasty have been compared based on surgical time to perform the procedure, postoperative healing, scar cosmesis, and cost. Few studies have evaluated the histology of the excised tissue, and no study has compared the tissue histology of 3 blepharoplasty methods using scalpel, microdissection needle with electrocautery, and CO2 laser excision in the same patient.

[OBJECTIVE] To evaluate the histologic changes of tissue after removal of upper eyelid skin using scalpel incision, microdissection electrocautery needle, and CO2 laser.

[METHODS] Upper blepharoplasty skin excisions were examined from specimens obtained using scalpel incision, microdissection needle tip with electrocautery, and CO2 continuous wave beam. The specimens were sent for permanent sections for histologic evaluation.

[RESULTS] The skin that was removed using cold steel scalpel incision showed no cellular necrosis or heat artifact. The tissue treated with the CO2 laser demonstrated significant thermal injury, including loss of cellular polarity, keratinocyte necrosis, and separation of the epidermis from the basement membrane. The skin excised using the electrocautery microdissection needle demonstrated fulguration artifact, including spindling of the epidermal nuclei with palisading of the keratinocytes. Necrosis was not prominent in the electrocautery microdissection needle specimens.

[CONCLUSION] The amount of histologic tissue injury was greatest in the skin treated with continuous wave CO2 laser, followed by the microdissection needle with electrocautery. The cold steel scalpel incision showed no cellular necrosis.