Measuring satisfaction with appearance: Validation of the FACE-Q scales for double-eyelid blepharoplasty with minor incision in young Asians- retrospective study of 200 cases.

[BACKGROUND] Double eye-lid surgery is one of the most popular performed aesthetic procedures in young Asians. Reliable measurement of patient reported outcomes is crucial for facial aesthetics. The FACE-Q is a new patient-reported outcome tool (PRO) composed of numerous independently functioning scales and checklists designed to measure outcomes. Here we described FACE-Q scales for double eye-lid surgery with minor incision in young Asians.

[METHODS] 200 patients (400 eyes) aged from 21 to 30 years-old were recruited from 2012 to 2014. They underwent minor incision procedure for double-eyelid blepharoplasty, epicanthic fold correction, excessive orbit fat removal and blepharoptosis correction simultaneously. An incision of 1 cm long in the middle of upper eyelid and modified Park's Z-plasty for epicanthus correction were designed. Three stitches were carried out in levator aponeurosis-inferior dermis procedure. By the middle incision in the upper eyelid, blepharoptosis correction and excessive orbit fat removal can be executed. Those patients were asked to complete anonymously the FACE-Q by e-mail. FACE-Q scores were assessed for each domain (range, 0 to 100), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with appearance or superior quality of life.

[RESULTS] After a mean of 2 years' follow-up, postoperative complications included partial or complete loss of the double-eyelid fold in 8 and 0 cases, respectively, no hypertrophic scar formation, and asymmetric fold in four cases. One patient received re-operation on blepharoptosis correction. Except hematoma occurring in one female case, no obvious edema was observed. Patients demonstrated high levels of satisfaction with eye appearance overall (mean ± SD, 81.7 ± 18.3). Quality of Life Patients exhibited high levels of quality of life, including in social confidence (95.4 ± 12.6), psychological well-being (97.8 ± 10.3), and early life impact of the procedure (90.2 ± 13.4). Patients reported high satisfaction with the decision to undergo and the outcome of the procedure.

[CONCLUSIONS] Minimally invasive procedure is a reliable tool for correcting disfigurement in double-eyelid blepharoplasty. However, this method is not suitable for those cases whose upper eyelids are featured by relaxation. Excessive amount of skin must be removed. Patients who responded in this study were extremely satisfied with their decision to undergo double-eyelid surgery and the outcomes and quality of life following the procedure.