Patient and physician perceptions of medicare reimbursement policy for blepharoplasty and blepharoptosis surgery.
Abstract
[OBJECTIVE] To describe patient preferences regarding payment for blepharoplasty and blepharoptosis repair and physician practices before and after the 2009 change in reimbursement for these 2 procedures by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).
[DESIGN] Cross-sectional study.
[PARTICIPANTS] Fifty patients presenting for functional blepharoplasty and blepharoptosis repair at an academic oculoplastic practice and 198 members of the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
[METHODS] A 5-question paper survey was administered to patients, and a 5-question web-based survey was distributed to 510 unique physician e-mail addresses obtained from the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery mailing list server in 2010.
[MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES] The surveys elicited patient knowledge and attitudes regarding the reimbursement policy of the CMS and physician knowledge and behaviors before and after the reimbursement policy change.
[RESULTS] Ninety-one percent of patients would be opposed to having to pay out of pocket for blepharoplasty or having to wait at least 3 months after ptosis repair to have a blepharoplasty. When asked to choose between these options, 62% of the patients would rather have the 2 surgeries performed separately than pay out-of-pocket. Before the reimbursement policy change by the CMS, 77% of oculoplastic surgeons performed blepharoplasty and blepharoptosis repair in the same sitting, whereas 37% did so after the policy change (P<0.001). Compared with before the policy change by the CMS, more surgeons performed the 2 procedures at least 3 months apart (4% before vs. 29% after, P<0.001) and more often billed patients for a cosmetic blepharoplasty (5% before vs. 12% after, P = 0.009).
[CONCLUSIONS] Our study suggests that oculoplastic surgeons have made a change in the delivery of ptosis and blepharoplasty surgical services after the reimbursement policy change for these procedures by the CMS in 2009. This change, in which patients undergo separate surgical visits for ptosis repair and blepharoplasty, is not desirable to most patients.
[DESIGN] Cross-sectional study.
[PARTICIPANTS] Fifty patients presenting for functional blepharoplasty and blepharoptosis repair at an academic oculoplastic practice and 198 members of the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
[METHODS] A 5-question paper survey was administered to patients, and a 5-question web-based survey was distributed to 510 unique physician e-mail addresses obtained from the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery mailing list server in 2010.
[MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES] The surveys elicited patient knowledge and attitudes regarding the reimbursement policy of the CMS and physician knowledge and behaviors before and after the reimbursement policy change.
[RESULTS] Ninety-one percent of patients would be opposed to having to pay out of pocket for blepharoplasty or having to wait at least 3 months after ptosis repair to have a blepharoplasty. When asked to choose between these options, 62% of the patients would rather have the 2 surgeries performed separately than pay out-of-pocket. Before the reimbursement policy change by the CMS, 77% of oculoplastic surgeons performed blepharoplasty and blepharoptosis repair in the same sitting, whereas 37% did so after the policy change (P<0.001). Compared with before the policy change by the CMS, more surgeons performed the 2 procedures at least 3 months apart (4% before vs. 29% after, P<0.001) and more often billed patients for a cosmetic blepharoplasty (5% before vs. 12% after, P = 0.009).
[CONCLUSIONS] Our study suggests that oculoplastic surgeons have made a change in the delivery of ptosis and blepharoplasty surgical services after the reimbursement policy change for these procedures by the CMS in 2009. This change, in which patients undergo separate surgical visits for ptosis repair and blepharoplasty, is not desirable to most patients.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | blepharoplasty
|
안검성형술 | dict | 9 | |
| 약물 | [MAIN OUTCOME
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | blepharoptosis
|
C0005745
Blepharoptosis
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | cosmetic blepharoplasty
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | ptosis
|
C0005745
Blepharoptosis
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | ptosis repair
|
C0197280
Repair of blepharoptosis
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blepharoplasty; Blepharoptosis; Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Financing, Personal; Health Care Surveys; Humans; Male; Medicare; Middle Aged; Ophthalmology; Patient Preference; Patients; Physicians; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Reimbursement Mechanisms; Societies, Medical; United States
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Implications of Dermatologic Disorders in Facial Cosmetic Surgery: A Systematic Review.
- Mohs Surgery Defect Closure Using Blepharoplasty.
- Red and near-infrared photobiomodulation for burn, hypertrophic, and post-surgical scars: a scoping review of clinical trials.
- Correction of tear trough deformity in young patients without eyebags using orbital fat reposition and release of tear trough ligament.
- The Efficacy of Lower Blepharoplasty With Subobicularis Oculi Fat Lift and Fat Pad Transposition in Middle-Aged Patients.