The 3-Year Results of a 100-Patient Prospective Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Mia Femtech.

Aesthetic surgery journal 2026 Vol.46(3) p. 250-259

Chacon-Quiros M, Sforza M, Solis-Chaves P, Herrera-Mora G, Botti G, Munhoz AM, Verdonck K, Nagumo Y, Cole D'Incelli R, Villalobos-Alpizar J, Clausen-Oreamuno C, Randquist C

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Conventional breast augmentation using different approaches and implant pockets faces challenges such as societal stigma, long recovery time, invasion of the breast, and complication rates. Previous minimally invasive approaches have failed to provide long-term safety, effectiveness, and patient satisfaction. The authors of this study introduce a minimally invasive breast harmonization procedure, performed with an inflatable balloon and a biconvex-shaped silicone-filled implant, addressing these limitations with a safe and innovative solution.

[OBJECTIVES] In this prospective controlled study, the authors evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this procedure, reducing surgical complications while providing a new treatment option for breast enhancement.

[METHODS] A 3-year, IRB-approved study enrolled 100 participants undergoing this procedure, utilizing an axillary incision with prepectoral implant placement. Safety was assessed by monitoring the cumulative incidence of postoperative complications in scheduled visits and with MRI evaluations in a randomized subcohort (33 participants). Patient satisfaction was measured pre- and postprocedure using Breast-Q questionnaires and scar evaluation with the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale.

[RESULTS] Effectiveness endpoint at 3 years reported a 75.3% bra increase of 1 to 3 cup sizes. The overall Kaplan-Meier complication rate at 3 years was 3.2%, with low reoperation rates and 93% follow-up compliance. There were no patient reports of nipple or breast sensitivity loss, nor surgeon-reported incision-related complications, implant rupture, capsular contracture (Baker Grade III/IV), infection, seroma, rippling, hematoma, or breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma.

[CONCLUSIONS] This study demonstrates very low complication rates, faster recovery, and enhanced patient satisfaction with this procedure compared with conventional breast augmentation. Its minimally invasive tissue-preservation approach introduces new surgical concepts, advancing surgical techniques and technologies beyond conventional methods.

[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] : 4 (Therapeutic).

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 breast 유방 dict 8
시술 breast augmentation 유방성형술 dict 2
합병증 hematoma 혈종 dict 1
합병증 seroma 장액종 dict 1
합병증 infection 감염 dict 1
합병증 capsular contracture 피막구축 dict 1
합병증 implant rupture 보형물 파열 dict 1
합병증 anaplastic large cell lymphoma 보형물연관 역형성대세포림프종 dict 1
합병증 prepectoral implant scispacy 1
합병증 scar scispacy 1
약물 Mia C1417154
MIA gene
scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] scispacy 1
약물 [OBJECTIVES] scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] scispacy 1
질환 nipple or breast sensitivity loss scispacy 1
질환 breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma C4528210
Breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma
scispacy 1
질환 Mia Femtech scispacy 1
질환 nipple scispacy 1
기타 patient scispacy 1
기타 axillary scispacy 1
기타 incision-related scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Female; Prospective Studies; Patient Satisfaction; Adult; Breast Implants; Breast Implantation; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Treatment Outcome; Prosthesis Design; Silicone Gels; Follow-Up Studies; Young Adult; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Time Factors

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문