Breast Implants or Lipofilling in Augmentation Mammoplasty? A Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Trial.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] The author presents his own experience using breast implants (BIs) or fat grafting, commonly called lipofilling (LPF), to correct breast hypoplasia.
[OBJECTIVES] Compare the aesthetic results obtained in a study group (SG) using BIs in breast hypoplasia correction with those of a control group (CG) treated with LPF, analyzing the influence of breast and chest deformities (tuberous breast, breast volume differences/asymmetries, nipple-areola complex asymmetry, pectus excavatum, and carinatum) in the outcomes.
[METHODS] A randomized, open-label controlled study was performed. A total of 95 patients affected by breast hypoplasia (SG) were treated with BI, comparing results with the CG (n = 90) treated with LPF. The pre-operative analysis was conducted through anamnesis (considering also the patient's expectations), clinical and photographic assessment, and an instrumental evaluation based on magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound. Post-operative follow-up occurred at 1, 2, 4 weeks, 3, 6, 12 months, and then annually until the fourth year.
[RESULTS] 87,5% (n = 83) of SG patients treated with BI showed excellent aesthetic outcomes after 12 months compared with the CG patients treated with LPF, who showed the same results in 70% (n = 63) of cases. Breast augmentation maintenance in the SG was significantly higher than in the CG (p < .0001). However, more natural results were reported in the CG than in the SG (p < .0001).
[CONCLUSIONS] BI and LPF were safe and effective in this controlled trial. CG's patients displayed more natural results, obtaining a better pectus excavatum correction, while SG's patients showed more evident and lasting results.
[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I] This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
[OBJECTIVES] Compare the aesthetic results obtained in a study group (SG) using BIs in breast hypoplasia correction with those of a control group (CG) treated with LPF, analyzing the influence of breast and chest deformities (tuberous breast, breast volume differences/asymmetries, nipple-areola complex asymmetry, pectus excavatum, and carinatum) in the outcomes.
[METHODS] A randomized, open-label controlled study was performed. A total of 95 patients affected by breast hypoplasia (SG) were treated with BI, comparing results with the CG (n = 90) treated with LPF. The pre-operative analysis was conducted through anamnesis (considering also the patient's expectations), clinical and photographic assessment, and an instrumental evaluation based on magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound. Post-operative follow-up occurred at 1, 2, 4 weeks, 3, 6, 12 months, and then annually until the fourth year.
[RESULTS] 87,5% (n = 83) of SG patients treated with BI showed excellent aesthetic outcomes after 12 months compared with the CG patients treated with LPF, who showed the same results in 70% (n = 63) of cases. Breast augmentation maintenance in the SG was significantly higher than in the CG (p < .0001). However, more natural results were reported in the CG than in the SG (p < .0001).
[CONCLUSIONS] BI and LPF were safe and effective in this controlled trial. CG's patients displayed more natural results, obtaining a better pectus excavatum correction, while SG's patients showed more evident and lasting results.
[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I] This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 해부 | breast
|
유방 | dict | 9 | |
| 시술 | augmentation mammoplasty
|
유방성형술 | dict | 1 | |
| 시술 | breast augmentation
|
유방성형술 | dict | 1 | |
| 해부 | fat
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | nipple-areola
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | asymmetry
|
비대칭 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | excavatum
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND] The
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [OBJECTIVES]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | 3, 6, 12
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS] BI
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | breast hypoplasia
|
C0266013
Congenital hypoplasia of breast
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | breast and chest deformities
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | tuberous breast
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | breast volume differences/asymmetries
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | pectus excavatum
|
C0016842
Congenital pectus excavatum
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | Breast Implants
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | LPF
→ lipofilling
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | carinatum
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patient
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Humans; Female; Adult; Mammaplasty; Breast Implants; Adipose Tissue; Esthetics; Breast; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult; Middle Aged; Follow-Up Studies; Patient Satisfaction; Breast Implantation
📑 인용 관계
이 논문이 참조한 문헌 13
- Breast Silicone Gel Implants versus Autologous Fat Grafting: Biomaterials and Bioactive Materials in…
- Fat Graft Enhanced With Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Aesthetic Breast Augmentation: Clinical, Histo…
- Correction of tuberous breast deformity: A retrospective study comparing lipofilling versus breast i…
- Challenging Breast Augmentations: The Influence of Preoperative Anatomical Features on the Final Res…
- Incidence of breast and chest wall asymmetry in breast augmentation: a retrospective analysis of 100…
- Skeletal and postural relations in augmentation mammaplasty.
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Cutaneous fistula of the breast: A complication of cosmetic autologous fat transfer.
- Epidermal inclusion cyst after breast reduction mammoplasty.
- Clinical outcomes of synthetic absorbable mesh use in breast surgery: First case series in reconstruction and aesthetic mastopexy.
- Implant-based versus autologous mastopexy after massive weight loss: Complications and patient satisfaction.