Surgical Trauma Comparison of Inframammary Fold versus Endoscopic Transaxillary Approaches in Breast Augmentation: A 7-Year Cohort Study.

[BACKGROUND] This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess differences in surgical trauma between the inframammary fold approach and endoscopic transaxillary approach in breast augmentation surgery.

[METHODS] One hundred and ninety-four patients who underwent breast augmentation using either an inframammary fold or endoscopic transaxillary approach were enrolled. All procedures were primary and bilateral cases. Patients' demographics and indicators, such as operation duration, postoperative volume of drainage, drainage duration, length of hospital stay, and postoperative pain scores, were observed and analyzed.

[RESULTS] One hundred and five patients underwent inframammary fold incisions, while the remaining 89 received transaxillary incisions. The operation duration was significantly shorter in the inframammary fold group than in the transaxillary group, while the VAS scores were significantly lower (p < 0.001). Similarly, differences in the age and fertility status between the two groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were noted in the scores of the remaining indicators (p < 0.05).

[CONCLUSIONS] This research demonstrated that while patients in the endoscopic transaxillary group were typically younger, which is commonly hypothesized to result in superior results, the inframammary fold approach may offer a surgical option with reduced trauma and pain and concomitantly greater convenience and efficiency, yielding high satisfaction levels among Chinese women.

[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III] This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.