Medicaid coverage for gender-affirming surgery: A state-by-state review.
Abstract
[OBJECTIVE] To systematically review Medicaid policies state-by-state for gender-affirming surgery coverage.
[DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING] Primary data were collected for each US state utilizing the LexisNexis legal database, state legislature publications, and Medicaid manuals.
[STUDY DESIGN] A cross-sectional study evaluating Medicaid coverage for numerous gender-affirming surgeries.
[DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS] We previously reported on state health policies that protect gender-affirming care under Medicaid coverage. Building upon our prior work, we systematically assessed the 27 states with protective policies to determine coverage for each type of gender-affirming surgery. We analyzed Medicaid coverage for gender-affirming surgeries in four domains: chest, genital, craniofacial and neck reconstruction, and miscellaneous procedures. Medicaid coverage for each type of surgery was categorized as explicitly covered, explicitly noncovered, or not described.
[PRINCIPAL FINDINGS] Among the 27 states with protective Medicaid policies, 17 states (63.0%) provided explicit coverage for at least one gender-affirming chest procedure and at least one gender-affirming genital procedure, while only eight states (29.6%) provided explicit coverage for at least one craniofacial and neck procedure (p = 0.04). Coverage for specific surgical procedures within these three anatomical domains varied. The most common explicitly covered procedures were breast reduction/mastectomy and hysterectomy (n = 17, 63.0%). The most common explicitly noncovered surgery was reversal surgery (n = 12, 44.4%). Several states did not describe the specific surgical procedures covered; thus, final coverage rates are indeterminate.
[CONCLUSIONS] In 2022, 52.9% of states had health policies that protected gender-affirming care under Medicaid; however, coverage for various gender-affirming surgical procedures remains both variable and occasionally unspecified. When specified, craniofacial and neck reconstruction is the least covered anatomical area compared with chest and genital reconstruction.
[DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING] Primary data were collected for each US state utilizing the LexisNexis legal database, state legislature publications, and Medicaid manuals.
[STUDY DESIGN] A cross-sectional study evaluating Medicaid coverage for numerous gender-affirming surgeries.
[DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS] We previously reported on state health policies that protect gender-affirming care under Medicaid coverage. Building upon our prior work, we systematically assessed the 27 states with protective policies to determine coverage for each type of gender-affirming surgery. We analyzed Medicaid coverage for gender-affirming surgeries in four domains: chest, genital, craniofacial and neck reconstruction, and miscellaneous procedures. Medicaid coverage for each type of surgery was categorized as explicitly covered, explicitly noncovered, or not described.
[PRINCIPAL FINDINGS] Among the 27 states with protective Medicaid policies, 17 states (63.0%) provided explicit coverage for at least one gender-affirming chest procedure and at least one gender-affirming genital procedure, while only eight states (29.6%) provided explicit coverage for at least one craniofacial and neck procedure (p = 0.04). Coverage for specific surgical procedures within these three anatomical domains varied. The most common explicitly covered procedures were breast reduction/mastectomy and hysterectomy (n = 17, 63.0%). The most common explicitly noncovered surgery was reversal surgery (n = 12, 44.4%). Several states did not describe the specific surgical procedures covered; thus, final coverage rates are indeterminate.
[CONCLUSIONS] In 2022, 52.9% of states had health policies that protected gender-affirming care under Medicaid; however, coverage for various gender-affirming surgical procedures remains both variable and occasionally unspecified. When specified, craniofacial and neck reconstruction is the least covered anatomical area compared with chest and genital reconstruction.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | breast reduction
|
유방성형술 | dict | 1 | |
| 해부 | breast
|
유방 | dict | 1 | |
| 해부 | genital
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | genital
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [OBJECTIVE]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS] In
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | craniofacial
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Humans; Medicaid; United States; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Male; Gender-Affirming Surgery; Insurance Coverage; Health Policy; Transgender Persons; State Government
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Cutaneous fistula of the breast: A complication of cosmetic autologous fat transfer.
- Epidermal inclusion cyst after breast reduction mammoplasty.
- Clinical outcomes of synthetic absorbable mesh use in breast surgery: First case series in reconstruction and aesthetic mastopexy.
- Implant-based versus autologous mastopexy after massive weight loss: Complications and patient satisfaction.