Picking the Right Plane: A Comparison of Total Submuscular, Dual-Plane, and Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2022 Vol.150(4) p. 737e-746e

Bekisz JM, Salibian AA, Frey JD, Choi M, Karp NS

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Implant-based breast reconstruction has evolved, with a recent resurgence of prepectoral techniques. Comparative reconstructive outcomes and complications have not been elucidated fully among the total submuscular, dual-plane, and prepectoral planes of implant placement.

[METHODS] All immediate implant-based breast reconstructions from March of 2017 through August of 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Cases were divided into total submuscular, dual-plane, and prepectoral cohorts. Demographics, operative techniques, and reconstructive outcomes and complications were compared among groups.

[RESULTS] A total of 826 cases (510 patients) were identified and divided into total submuscular ( n = 392), dual-plane ( n = 358), and prepectoral ( n = 76) cohorts. Average follow-up for all patients was 27 months. The prepectoral cohort had a higher average body mass index and rate of previous reduction or mastopexy. Overall complications were lowest in the total submuscular group, although this difference was not statistically significant. Major infection occurred more frequently in the dual-plane group compared with the total submuscular cohort. The prepectoral cohort had a significantly increased incidence of wound dehiscence than the total submuscular group; both the dual-plane and prepectoral groups had higher rates of seroma formation and explantation compared with the total submuscular group.

[CONCLUSIONS] Overall reconstructive complication rates were comparable among the cohorts. Compared with those undergoing total submuscular reconstruction, the dual-plane cohort was more likely to develop a major infection or require explantation, whereas the prepectoral group had significantly higher rates of isolated dehiscence, seroma formation, and explantation. This suggests that the absence of overlying vascularized muscle may lead to an inherent inability to tolerate wound-healing complications, although further research is needed to clarify these observations. .

[CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] Therapeutic, III.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
기법 submuscular 근막하 평면 dict 9
해부 breast 유방 dict 3
합병증 seroma 장액종 dict 2
합병증 infection 감염 dict 2
시술 mastopexy 유방성형술 dict 1
해부 prepectoral scispacy 1
해부 muscle scispacy 1
합병증 wound dehiscence 상처열개 dict 1
합병증 dehiscence 상처열개 dict 1
합병증 wound scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] Implant-based scispacy 1
약물 [RESULTS] A scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] Overall scispacy 1
질환 Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction scispacy 1
기타 Dual-Plane scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Breast Implantation; Breast Implants; Breast Neoplasms; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Mammaplasty; Retrospective Studies; Seroma

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문