Use of Three-Dimensional Imaging to Assess the Effectiveness of Volume as a Critical Variable in Breast Implant Selection.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] In breast augmentation, breast base diameter has been recognized as an important variable in implant selection. However, breast implant volume also has a tremendous impact on the final result. Previous methods of preoperative volume determination have been limited to external devices in a bra. Computer-based three-dimensional simulation technology now allows the physician to effectively communicate with the patient preoperatively regarding volume.
[METHODS] A cohort of 40 consecutive patients underwent routine breast augmentation with either anatomically shaped or round implants. Five methods of preoperative volume determination including the Crisalix three-dimensional computer imaging system (Crisalix Virtual Aesthetics, Lausanne, Switzerland), along with an associated virtual reality tool, were used to assess the preoperative desires of the patients. A postoperative questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction with each volume determination method.
[RESULTS] Of the 40 patients, 100 percent were satisfied with their result; however, given the opportunity, 12 percent would have chosen a larger implant. The virtual reality tool and external sizers were shown to be the most effective in choosing an implant. The virtual reality tool was judged to be very helpful (62 percent), very accurate (78 percent), and important (88 percent) in helping patients choose their desired implant size.
[CONCLUSION] Prioritizing volume as an implant selection variable in breast augmentation results in a very high rate of patient satisfaction.
[CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] Therapeutic, IV.
[METHODS] A cohort of 40 consecutive patients underwent routine breast augmentation with either anatomically shaped or round implants. Five methods of preoperative volume determination including the Crisalix three-dimensional computer imaging system (Crisalix Virtual Aesthetics, Lausanne, Switzerland), along with an associated virtual reality tool, were used to assess the preoperative desires of the patients. A postoperative questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction with each volume determination method.
[RESULTS] Of the 40 patients, 100 percent were satisfied with their result; however, given the opportunity, 12 percent would have chosen a larger implant. The virtual reality tool and external sizers were shown to be the most effective in choosing an implant. The virtual reality tool was judged to be very helpful (62 percent), very accurate (78 percent), and important (88 percent) in helping patients choose their desired implant size.
[CONCLUSION] Prioritizing volume as an implant selection variable in breast augmentation results in a very high rate of patient satisfaction.
[CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] Therapeutic, IV.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 해부 | breast
|
유방 | dict | 6 | |
| 시술 | breast augmentation
|
유방성형술 | dict | 3 | |
| 합병증 | breast base
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | breast implant
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | breast implant
|
C0178391
breast implant procedure
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 기타 | patient
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Adult; Breast Implantation; Breast Implants; Female; Humans; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Prosthesis Design
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Cutaneous fistula of the breast: A complication of cosmetic autologous fat transfer.
- Epidermal inclusion cyst after breast reduction mammoplasty.
- Clinical outcomes of synthetic absorbable mesh use in breast surgery: First case series in reconstruction and aesthetic mastopexy.
- Implant-based versus autologous mastopexy after massive weight loss: Complications and patient satisfaction.