[Diagnosis Related Groups in reconstructive plastic surgery of malignant head and neck skin tumours].

Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripheren Nerven und Gefasse : Organ der V... 2018 Vol.50(2) p. 126-133

Lotter O, Micheel M, Jaminet P

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) were introduced in Germany as a medico-economic classification system 13 years ago. In this analysis, we looked into the compensation for reconstructive plastic surgery after the excision of malignant head and neck skin tumours by DRGs.

[MATERIAL AND METHODS] Four main diagnoses (malignant melanoma, basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, carcinoma in situ) at a maximum of 6 different locations in the head and neck were combined with the following procedures: excision and primary wound closure, excision with temporary soft tissue coverage, split-thickness or full-thickness skin grafting, local, free or regional pedicle flaps, distant flaps as well as combined procedures for coverage.

[RESULTS] We defined 10 different DRGs based on 5750 combinations of diagnoses and procedures. DRG J22Z (revenue: EUR 2817) predominated for large temporary soft tissue coverage and skin grafting techniques. In 2017, local flaps were devaluated and now lead to DRG J11D (revenue: EUR 1903) in most cases. In this context, an aggregation of cases by a two-stage approach (stage 1: excision, stage 2: reconstruction) is particularly important. Malignant tumours of the lips are inconsistently represented by DRGs with a lack of definite rules. The highly rated main group DRG J08 (including DRGs J08A, J08B and J08C) can be achieved almost invariably by addition of specific single procedures.

[CONCLUSION] The current representation of reconstructive surgery for malignant skin tumours by DRGs is associated with potential disincentive effects, which may have an impact on patient care. In search of a diversified portfolio, the main group DRG J08 should be considered in addition to the common practice of coding. The authors of this study think that this may be a possibility to compensate for the actual devaluation and to achieve resource-related reimbursement in high-cost cases. However, incorrect and inflationary use should be avoided due to the lack of long-term orientation caused by dilution of the DRGs.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 skin grafting 피부이식 dict 2
해부 soft tissue scispacy 1
해부 skin scispacy 1
해부 flaps scispacy 1
해부 lips scispacy 1
합병증 wound scispacy 1
합병증 pedicle flaps scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] scispacy 1
약물 [MATERIAL AND scispacy 1
질환 tumours C0027651
Neoplasms
scispacy 1
질환 malignant melanoma C0025202
melanoma
scispacy 1
질환 basal cell carcinoma C0007117
Basal cell carcinoma
scispacy 1
질환 squamous cell carcinoma, C0007137
Squamous cell carcinoma
scispacy 1
질환 carcinoma C0007097
Carcinoma
scispacy 1
질환 malignant head and neck skin tumours scispacy 1
질환 squamous cell carcinoma scispacy 1
질환 head and neck scispacy 1
질환 Malignant tumours scispacy 1
질환 DRG J08 scispacy 1
질환 skin tumours scispacy 1
기타 DRGs → Diagnosis Related Groups scispacy 1
기타 DRG J22Z scispacy 1
기타 patient scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Diagnosis-Related Groups; Germany; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Skin Neoplasms; Surgery, Plastic; Surgical Flaps

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문