Drainage on augmentation mammoplasty: Does it work?

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS 2021 Vol.74(5) p. 1093-1100

Charles-de-Sá L, Gontijo-de-Amorim NF, Rossi JK, Messeder AMDC, Jorge LNA, da Mota DSC, Aboudib JH

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Breast prostheses could be associated with complications, despite many studies on surgical materials and techniques. The role of surgical drainage in preventing complications on breast prostheses surgery is controversial.

[OBJECTIVES] This study aimed to evaluate the role and effectiveness of vacuum drainage in the augmentation mammoplasty.

[METHODS] A prospective multicentric randomized comparative clinical trial was conducted with 150 patients, who were the candidates for breast augmentation. The candidates were split into two groups to analyze the breast drain role. Group1: closed-suction drainage; measurements were taken every 24 h for 48 h. Group2: control (no drainage); all the patients were submitted to a clinical and postoperative ultrasonography evaluation (7th day and 3rd month). The late consultations (1st-, 2nd-, and 3rd-year postoperative time) were carried out to identify any complication, such as infection, seroma, hematoma, asymmetry, hypertrophic scarring, rippling, implant position, visible edges, and sensibility alteration.

[RESULTS] A total of 150 female patients were operated with 300 breast implants placed into subglandular pocket. In the first 24 h postoperative (D1), the drainage volume ranged from 12 ml to 210 ml (mean= 74.90 ml; SD= 43.29 ml). After 24 h, on the second day (D2), the collected volume ranged from 10 ml to 120 ml (mean= 44.76 ml; SD= 24.80 ml). The total drainage volume in the 48 h ranged from 22 ml to 320 ml (mean= 119.7 ml; SD= 62.20 ml). The breast ultrasonography series (BUSGS) analysis was done on the 7th day and 3rd month in both groups. There was no significant difference between G1 and G2 groups (p = 0.05 and 0.25, respectively). In the follow-up, some patients (33-44%) declared sensitivity disturbing on the nipple-areola complex (NAC) and lower breast segment.

[CONCLUSIONS] The closed-suction breast drainage in breast augmentation was associated with high cost and time-consuming and not demonstrated any benefit in a recent postoperative time.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 breast 유방 dict 9
시술 augmentation mammoplasty 유방성형술 dict 2
시술 breast augmentation 유방성형술 dict 2
해부 nac 유방 dict 1
합병증 breast drain scispacy 1
합병증 subglandular pocket scispacy 1
합병증 hematoma 혈종 dict 1
합병증 seroma 장액종 dict 1
합병증 infection 감염 dict 1
합병증 asymmetry 비대칭 dict 1
약물 Group2 scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] Breast prostheses scispacy 1
약물 [OBJECTIVES] scispacy 1
약물 [RESULTS] A scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] The scispacy 1
질환 hypertrophic scarring C0162810
Cicatrix, Hypertrophic
scispacy 1
질환 breast drainage scispacy 1
질환 breast prostheses scispacy 1
질환 BUSGS → breast ultrasonography series scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Adolescent; Adult; Brazil; Breast Implants; Drainage; Female; Humans; Mammaplasty; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Ultrasonography, Mammary; Vacuum

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문