MemoryGel Breast Implants: Final Safety and Efficacy Results after 10 Years of Follow-Up.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Mentor MemoryGel Breast Implants were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in November of 2006. Patients in the Core clinical study supporting this approval were followed for 10 years.
[METHODS] This prospective, multicenter, clinical study included primary augmentation, revision augmentation, primary reconstruction, and revision reconstruction patients implanted with smooth or Siltex Texture MemoryGel Implants. Incidence, severity, and method of resolution for all postoperative complications were assessed on per-patient and per-implant bases. The primary effectiveness endpoints were overall mean change in chest circumference and bra cup size following the implantation procedure.
[RESULTS] Primary augmentation (n = 552), revision augmentation (n = 145), primary reconstruction (n = 251), and revision reconstruction (n = 60) patients were enrolled in the study. Kaplan-Meier estimated 10-year cumulative incidence rates for key complications at the subject level for Baker grade III/IV capsular contracture were as follows: primary augmentation, 12.1 percent; revision augmentation, 24.4 percent; primary reconstruction, 20.5 percent; and revision reconstruction, 36.9 percent. For infection, rates were as follows: primary augmentation, 1.6 percent; revision augmentation, 1.4 percent; primary reconstruction, 6.2 percent; and revision reconstruction, 0 percent. For explantation with or without replacement, rates were as follows: primary augmentation, 11.6 percent; revision augmentation, 24.1 percent; primary reconstruction, 33.4 percent; and revision reconstruction; 37.8 percent. For rupture, rates were as follows: primary augmentation, 24.2 percent; revision augmentation, 23.7 percent; primary reconstruction, 32.7 percent; and revision reconstruction, 38.7 percent. For any reoperation, rates were as follows: primary augmentation, 25.5 percent; revision augmentation, 43.6 percent; primary reconstruction, 49.0 percent; and revision reconstruction, 50.7 percent.
[CONCLUSION] The results of this study demonstrate that MemoryGel Implants are safe and effective for use in women undergoing breast augmentation or reconstruction.
[CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] Therapeutic, IV.
[METHODS] This prospective, multicenter, clinical study included primary augmentation, revision augmentation, primary reconstruction, and revision reconstruction patients implanted with smooth or Siltex Texture MemoryGel Implants. Incidence, severity, and method of resolution for all postoperative complications were assessed on per-patient and per-implant bases. The primary effectiveness endpoints were overall mean change in chest circumference and bra cup size following the implantation procedure.
[RESULTS] Primary augmentation (n = 552), revision augmentation (n = 145), primary reconstruction (n = 251), and revision reconstruction (n = 60) patients were enrolled in the study. Kaplan-Meier estimated 10-year cumulative incidence rates for key complications at the subject level for Baker grade III/IV capsular contracture were as follows: primary augmentation, 12.1 percent; revision augmentation, 24.4 percent; primary reconstruction, 20.5 percent; and revision reconstruction, 36.9 percent. For infection, rates were as follows: primary augmentation, 1.6 percent; revision augmentation, 1.4 percent; primary reconstruction, 6.2 percent; and revision reconstruction, 0 percent. For explantation with or without replacement, rates were as follows: primary augmentation, 11.6 percent; revision augmentation, 24.1 percent; primary reconstruction, 33.4 percent; and revision reconstruction; 37.8 percent. For rupture, rates were as follows: primary augmentation, 24.2 percent; revision augmentation, 23.7 percent; primary reconstruction, 32.7 percent; and revision reconstruction, 38.7 percent. For any reoperation, rates were as follows: primary augmentation, 25.5 percent; revision augmentation, 43.6 percent; primary reconstruction, 49.0 percent; and revision reconstruction, 50.7 percent.
[CONCLUSION] The results of this study demonstrate that MemoryGel Implants are safe and effective for use in women undergoing breast augmentation or reconstruction.
[CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] Therapeutic, IV.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 해부 | breast
|
유방 | dict | 3 | |
| 시술 | breast augmentation
|
유방성형술 | dict | 1 | |
| 해부 | smooth
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | infection
|
감염 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | capsular contracture
|
피막구축 | dict | 1 | |
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND] Mentor MemoryGel Breast Implants
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | primary augmentation
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | contracture
|
C0009917
Contracture
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | rupture
|
C3203359
Rupture
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | Siltex Texture MemoryGel Implants
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | Baker grade III/IV capsular contracture
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | MemoryGel Breast Implants
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | Patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | MemoryGel Implants
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | women
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Breast Implantation; Breast Implants; Device Removal; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Patient Safety; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Failure; Reoperation; United States; Young Adult
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Cutaneous fistula of the breast: A complication of cosmetic autologous fat transfer.
- Epidermal inclusion cyst after breast reduction mammoplasty.
- Penetrating globe injury following periocular hyaluronic acid filler injection: A case report.
- Clinical outcomes of synthetic absorbable mesh use in breast surgery: First case series in reconstruction and aesthetic mastopexy.