[Long-term outcome analysis of subjective and objective parameters after breast reduction in 159 cases: Patients judge differently from plastic surgeons].
Abstract
[INTRODUCTION] This work assessed both subjective and objective postoperative parameters after breast reduction surgery and compared between patients and plastic surgeons.
[PATIENTS AND METHODS] After an average postoperative observation period of 6.7 ± 2.7 (2 - 13) years, 159 out of 259 patients (61 %) were examined. The mean age at the time of surgery was 37 ± 14 (15 - 74) years. The postoperative anatomy of the breast and other anthropometric parameters were measured in cm with the patient in an upright position. The visual analogue scale (VAS) values for symmetry, size, shape, type of scar and overall satisfaction both from the patient's and from four plastic surgeons' perspectives were assessed and compared.
[RESULTS] Patients rated the postoperative result significantly better than surgeons. Good subjective ratings by patients for shape, symmetry and sensitivity correlated with high scores for overall assessment. Shape had the strongest influence on overall satisfaction (regression coefficient 0.357; p < 0.001), followed by symmetry (regression coefficient 0.239; p < 0.001) and sensitivity (regression coefficient 0.109; p = 0.040) of the breast. The better the subjective rating for symmetry by the patient, the smaller the measured difference of the jugulum-mamillary distance between left and right (regression coefficient -0.773; p = 0.002) and the smaller the difference in height of the lowest part of the breast between left and right (regression coefficient -0.465; p = 0.035). There was no significant correlation between age, weight, height, BMI, resected weight of the breast, postoperative breast size or type of scar with overall satisfaction.
[CONCLUSION] After breast reduction surgery, long-term outcome is rated significantly better by patients than by plastic surgeons. Good subjective ratings by patients for shape, symmetry and sensitivity correlated with high scores for overall assessment. Shape had the strongest influence on overall satisfaction, followed by symmetry and sensitivity of the breast. Postoperative size of the breast, resection weight, type of scar, age or BMI was not of significant influence. Symmetry was the only assessed subjective parameter of this study that could be objectified by postoperative measurements.
[PATIENTS AND METHODS] After an average postoperative observation period of 6.7 ± 2.7 (2 - 13) years, 159 out of 259 patients (61 %) were examined. The mean age at the time of surgery was 37 ± 14 (15 - 74) years. The postoperative anatomy of the breast and other anthropometric parameters were measured in cm with the patient in an upright position. The visual analogue scale (VAS) values for symmetry, size, shape, type of scar and overall satisfaction both from the patient's and from four plastic surgeons' perspectives were assessed and compared.
[RESULTS] Patients rated the postoperative result significantly better than surgeons. Good subjective ratings by patients for shape, symmetry and sensitivity correlated with high scores for overall assessment. Shape had the strongest influence on overall satisfaction (regression coefficient 0.357; p < 0.001), followed by symmetry (regression coefficient 0.239; p < 0.001) and sensitivity (regression coefficient 0.109; p = 0.040) of the breast. The better the subjective rating for symmetry by the patient, the smaller the measured difference of the jugulum-mamillary distance between left and right (regression coefficient -0.773; p = 0.002) and the smaller the difference in height of the lowest part of the breast between left and right (regression coefficient -0.465; p = 0.035). There was no significant correlation between age, weight, height, BMI, resected weight of the breast, postoperative breast size or type of scar with overall satisfaction.
[CONCLUSION] After breast reduction surgery, long-term outcome is rated significantly better by patients than by plastic surgeons. Good subjective ratings by patients for shape, symmetry and sensitivity correlated with high scores for overall assessment. Shape had the strongest influence on overall satisfaction, followed by symmetry and sensitivity of the breast. Postoperative size of the breast, resection weight, type of scar, age or BMI was not of significant influence. Symmetry was the only assessed subjective parameter of this study that could be objectified by postoperative measurements.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 해부 | breast
|
유방 | dict | 10 | |
| 시술 | breast reduction
|
유방성형술 | dict | 3 | |
| 합병증 | scar
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [INTRODUCTION]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | scar
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | Patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patient
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Adult; Breast; Female; Humans; Mammaplasty; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Surgeons; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Cutaneous fistula of the breast: A complication of cosmetic autologous fat transfer.
- Epidermal inclusion cyst after breast reduction mammoplasty.
- Clinical outcomes of synthetic absorbable mesh use in breast surgery: First case series in reconstruction and aesthetic mastopexy.
- Implant-based versus autologous mastopexy after massive weight loss: Complications and patient satisfaction.