What is the Optimal Range of Medial Pocket Dissection in Breast Augmentation? An Anatomical Study of Chinese Women.

Aesthetic plastic surgery 2016 Vol.40(6) p. 863-868

Li S, Liu C, Mu D, Xin M, Fu S, Chen L, Luan J

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] The range of the medial dissection forbidden zone, defined as the no-touch zone in this study, is of great importance in breast augmentation. Currently, 30 mm of the no-touch zone is marked and the pocket dissection does not pass medial to this zone, which lacks anatomical evidence. This study aimed to determine the optimal range of the no-touch zone in breast augmentation by precisely locating relevant anatomical structures.

[METHODS] Preoperative multidetector-row CT angiography (MDCTA) was performed in 36 Chinese female patients who were to receive breast reconstruction. The MDCTA data were used to measure the healthy side's horizontal distance from the cutaneous perforators of the internal thoracic artery to the midline, from the sternal origin of the pectoralis major to the midline, from the sternal border to the midline, at the 2nd to 5th intercostal spaces in the subpectoral plane.

[RESULTS] All the target tissues were identified in MDCTA data. Mean distances from cutaneous perforators of the internal thoracic artery to the midline of the 2nd to 5th intercostal spaces were 19.66 ± 4.08, 20.37 ± 3.88, 21.00 ± 3.63, and 21.35 ± 4.80 mm; and that from the sternal origin of pectoralis major to midline were 5.00 ± 4.01, 4.83 ± 2.85, 11.67 ± 5.35, and 19.19 ± 7.10 mm; and that from the sternal border to the midline were 12.48 ± 1.70, 14.02 ± 2.05, 13.52 ± 2.91, and 4.68 ± 4.44 mm.

[CONCLUSIONS] Most of perforators of the internal thoracic arteries are disrupted in the current surgical process, indicating that the restrictive factor that affects the range of the no-touch zone is the sternal origin of the pectoralis major, rather than the cutaneous perforators. The range of the no-touch zone can be minimized to 20 mm in the 2nd and 3rd intercostal spaces, and can be 30 mm in the 4th intercostal space. However, surgeons should be more cautious to avoid disrupting the origin of the pectoralis major when dissecting the pocket of the 4th and 5th intercostal spaces.

[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV] This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 breast 유방 dict 4
시술 breast augmentation 유방성형술 dict 3
해부 medial scispacy 1
해부 pectoralis scispacy 1
해부 tissues scispacy 1
해부 midline scispacy 1
해부 perforators scispacy 1
합병증 midline scispacy 1
합병증 sternal border scispacy 1
약물 ± 4.80 scispacy 1
약물 ± 4.01, 4.83 scispacy 1
약물 ± 5.35, and 19.19 scispacy 1
약물 ± 7.10 scispacy 1
약물 ± 1.70, 14.02 scispacy 1
약물 ± 2.05, 13.52 scispacy 1
약물 ± 4.44 scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] The scispacy 1
약물 multidetector-row CT scispacy 1
약물 21.35 scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] scispacy 1
기법 subpectoral 근막하 평면 dict 1
기타 Women scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 thoracic artery scispacy 1
기타 thoracic arteries scispacy 1
기타 5th intercostal scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Adult; Asian People; Breast Implantation; Breast Implants; Cohort Studies; Dissection; Esthetics; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Mammaplasty; Middle Aged; Multidetector Computed Tomography; Pectoralis Muscles; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Sternum; Treatment Outcome; Wound Healing

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문