Combining abdominal and cosmetic breast surgery does not increase short-term complication rates: a comparison of each individual procedure and pretreatment risk stratification tool.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Combined abdominal and breast surgery presents a convenient and relatively cost-effective approach for accomplishing both procedures.
[OBJECTIVES] This study is the largest to date assessing the safety of combined procedures, and it aims to develop a simple pretreatment risk stratification method for patients who desire a combined procedure.
[METHODS] All women undergoing abdominoplasty, panniculectomy, augmentation mammaplasty, and/or mastopexy in the TOPS database were identified. Demographics and outcomes for combined procedures were compared to individual procedures using χ(2) and Student's t-tests. Multiple logistic regression provided adjusted odds ratios for the effect of a combined procedure on 30-day complications. Among combined procedures, a logistic regression model determined point values for pretreatment risk factors including diabetes (1 point), age over 53 (1), obesity (2), and 3+ ASA status (3), creating a 7-point pretreatment risk stratification tool.
[RESULTS] A total of 58,756 cases met inclusion criteria. Complication rates among combined procedures (9.40%) were greater than those of aesthetic breast surgery (2.66%; P < .001) but did not significantly differ from abdominal procedures (9.75%; P = .530). Nearly 77% of combined cases were classified as low-risk (0 points total) with a 9.78% complication rates. Medium-risk patients (1 to 3 points) had a 16.63% complication rate, and high-risk (4 to 7 points) 38.46%.
[CONCLUSIONS] Combining abdominal and breast procedures is safe in the majority of patients and does not increase 30-day complications rates. The risk stratification tool can continue to ensure favorable outcomes for patients who may desire a combined surgery.
[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] 4 Risk.
[OBJECTIVES] This study is the largest to date assessing the safety of combined procedures, and it aims to develop a simple pretreatment risk stratification method for patients who desire a combined procedure.
[METHODS] All women undergoing abdominoplasty, panniculectomy, augmentation mammaplasty, and/or mastopexy in the TOPS database were identified. Demographics and outcomes for combined procedures were compared to individual procedures using χ(2) and Student's t-tests. Multiple logistic regression provided adjusted odds ratios for the effect of a combined procedure on 30-day complications. Among combined procedures, a logistic regression model determined point values for pretreatment risk factors including diabetes (1 point), age over 53 (1), obesity (2), and 3+ ASA status (3), creating a 7-point pretreatment risk stratification tool.
[RESULTS] A total of 58,756 cases met inclusion criteria. Complication rates among combined procedures (9.40%) were greater than those of aesthetic breast surgery (2.66%; P < .001) but did not significantly differ from abdominal procedures (9.75%; P = .530). Nearly 77% of combined cases were classified as low-risk (0 points total) with a 9.78% complication rates. Medium-risk patients (1 to 3 points) had a 16.63% complication rate, and high-risk (4 to 7 points) 38.46%.
[CONCLUSIONS] Combining abdominal and breast procedures is safe in the majority of patients and does not increase 30-day complications rates. The risk stratification tool can continue to ensure favorable outcomes for patients who may desire a combined surgery.
[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] 4 Risk.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 해부 | breast
|
유방 | dict | 4 | |
| 시술 | mammaplasty
|
유방성형술 | dict | 1 | |
| 시술 | mastopexy
|
유방성형술 | dict | 1 | |
| 시술 | abdominoplasty
|
복부성형술 | dict | 1 | |
| 시술 | panniculectomy
|
복부성형술 | dict | 1 | |
| 해부 | abdominal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | abdominal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [OBJECTIVES]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [RESULTS] A
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | abdominal and cosmetic breast surgery
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | diabetes
|
C0011847
Diabetes
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | obesity
|
C0028754
Obesity
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | women
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Abdominoplasty; Adult; Age Distribution; Cohort Studies; Combined Modality Therapy; Esthetics; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Logistic Models; Mammaplasty; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Odds Ratio; Postoperative Complications; Preexisting Condition Coverage; Preoperative Care; Reference Values; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
📑 인용 관계
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Cutaneous fistula of the breast: A complication of cosmetic autologous fat transfer.
- Epidermal inclusion cyst after breast reduction mammoplasty.
- Clinical outcomes of synthetic absorbable mesh use in breast surgery: First case series in reconstruction and aesthetic mastopexy.
- Implant-based versus autologous mastopexy after massive weight loss: Complications and patient satisfaction.