Evaluation of a new wound closure device for linear surgical incisions: 3M Steri-Strip S Surgical Skin Closure versus subcuticular closure.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2010 Vol.125(1) p. 186-194

Kerrigan CL, Homa K

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Technological innovations are often adopted before scientific comparison to an accepted standard. The authors' study compared suture with a new coaptive film device, 3M Steri-Strip S Surgical Skin Closure, on linear incisions.

[METHODS] Patients undergoing Wise-pattern breast reduction or abdominal procedures had paired incisions randomly assigned to Steri-Strip S or suture closure. Key outcome measures were closure time, patient comfort, and scar quality at 6 months by patients and surgeons using a new scar evaluation tool, visual assessment of linear scars. Statistical differences between the two closure techniques were assessed by Wilcoxon signed rank test.

[RESULTS] Of 59 patients, eight were excluded from randomization (a surgeon judged Steri-Strip S to be a nonviable closure technique for mismatched wound edges). Fifty-one patients (breast, n = 24; abdomen, n = 27) were randomized. Operative time with Steri-Strip S for breast was 2.0 minutes (SD = 1.1) versus suture closure at 4.6 minutes (SD = 1.5; p < 0.001). Similarly, Steri-Strip S versus suture for the abdomen was faster (p < 0.001; 4.9 minutes, SD = 2.3 versus 10.1 minutes, SD = 3.4). Comfort scores did not differ between closures [5.8 (SD = 2.7) versus 6.9 (SD = 2.0), respectively, on breast (p = 0.142) and 7.7 (SD = 1.8) versus 7.7 (SD = 2.3) on abdomen (p = 0.903)]. Complication rates did not differ between closure types. Patients' visual assessment of linear scars rating of breasts was 3.8 (SD = 2.9) for Steri-Strip S and better at 2.6 (SD = 2.9) for suture (p = 0.008). One surgeon rated breast Steri-Strip S scars worse than suture scars (4.3 versus 3.7; p = 0.014). For abdominal scars, there was no difference in the patient or surgeon ratings.

[CONCLUSIONS] Steri-Strip S permits faster wound closure than suture. On the basis of patient reports of comfort and scar quality, surgeons increase efficiency and maintain quality with the use of Steri-Strip S on abdominal wounds but not on breast wounds.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 breast 유방 dict 6
시술 breast reduction 유방성형술 dict 1
해부 Skin scispacy 1
해부 abdominal scispacy 1
해부 breasts scispacy 1
합병증 wound scispacy 1
합병증 scar scispacy 1
합병증 abdomen scispacy 1
합병증 wounds scispacy 1
약물 breasts C0006141
Breast
scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] Steri-Strip S scispacy 1
질환 Wise-pattern breast scispacy 1
질환 breast Steri-Strip S scispacy 1
질환 breast wounds scispacy 1
기타 Patients scispacy 1
기타 patient scispacy 1
기타 Steri-Strip S versus suture scispacy 1
기타 Steri-Strip S scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Abdomen; Abdominal Muscles; Bandages; Cicatrix; Clinical Competence; Equipment Design; Female; Humans; Mammaplasty; Materials Testing; Sutures; Time Factors; Tissue Adhesives; Wound Healing

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문