Transumbilical breast augmentation: a practical review of a growing technique.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] The transumbilical breast augmentation procedure has been described in the literature since 1993. This indirect route for implant placement has received both criticism and praise over the years, without a comprehensive assessment of the procedure from the perspective of the patient. The growing patient demand for the procedure, combined with the increased use by surgeons, prompts a review of the procedure and a discussion of its pros and cons, including tabulated patient satisfaction data.
[METHODS] A retrospective chart review of 245 transumbilical breast augmentations performed by the second author from 2002 to 2004, including the 1-year patient satisfaction surveys, is presented. Additionally, complications from the procedure are also tabulated and compared with the complications published by our studies' dominant implant manufacturer in their 1-year follow-up published data. The patients were asked to rate their postoperative pain, numbness, firmness, size satisfaction, rippling, and overall satisfaction. Data were compiled and statistical analysis was performed using chi methods.
[RESULTS] The study revealed a strong negative correlation between both the study parameters of prepectoral implant location and postoperative firmness and the survey result of overall satisfaction (P = 0.0041). Conversely, numbness, pain, and rippling, long felt to be linked to satisfaction, were shown to have no statistical correlation with satisfaction. A strong positive correlation with satisfaction was seen with retropectoral (submuscular) implant location. The complications from transumbilical breast augmentation in our study were hematoma = 1 (0.4%), umbilical wound infection = 8 (3.2%), deflation = 3 (1.2%), tunnel seromas = 5 (2.0%), asymmetry = 10 (4.1%), capsular contracture = 9 (3.7%), implant infection (0.0%). These complication rates were comparable or less than other published methods of breast prosthesis implantation.
[CONCLUSIONS] Transumbilical breast augmentation is a safe and effective method for breast implant placement in selected patients. Patient satisfaction weighs heavily on implant location and postoperative firmness and less on other variables. The procedure is associated with a complication rate comparable with other methods and finds itself growing in demand and popularity secondary to high patient satisfaction.
[METHODS] A retrospective chart review of 245 transumbilical breast augmentations performed by the second author from 2002 to 2004, including the 1-year patient satisfaction surveys, is presented. Additionally, complications from the procedure are also tabulated and compared with the complications published by our studies' dominant implant manufacturer in their 1-year follow-up published data. The patients were asked to rate their postoperative pain, numbness, firmness, size satisfaction, rippling, and overall satisfaction. Data were compiled and statistical analysis was performed using chi methods.
[RESULTS] The study revealed a strong negative correlation between both the study parameters of prepectoral implant location and postoperative firmness and the survey result of overall satisfaction (P = 0.0041). Conversely, numbness, pain, and rippling, long felt to be linked to satisfaction, were shown to have no statistical correlation with satisfaction. A strong positive correlation with satisfaction was seen with retropectoral (submuscular) implant location. The complications from transumbilical breast augmentation in our study were hematoma = 1 (0.4%), umbilical wound infection = 8 (3.2%), deflation = 3 (1.2%), tunnel seromas = 5 (2.0%), asymmetry = 10 (4.1%), capsular contracture = 9 (3.7%), implant infection (0.0%). These complication rates were comparable or less than other published methods of breast prosthesis implantation.
[CONCLUSIONS] Transumbilical breast augmentation is a safe and effective method for breast implant placement in selected patients. Patient satisfaction weighs heavily on implant location and postoperative firmness and less on other variables. The procedure is associated with a complication rate comparable with other methods and finds itself growing in demand and popularity secondary to high patient satisfaction.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 해부 | breast
|
유방 | dict | 7 | |
| 시술 | breast augmentation
|
유방성형술 | dict | 4 | |
| 합병증 | prepectoral implant
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | wound
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | hematoma
|
혈종 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | wound infection
|
감염 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | infection
|
감염 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | capsular contracture
|
피막구축 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | asymmetry
|
비대칭 | dict | 1 | |
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND] The
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기법 | submuscular
|
근막하 평면 | dict | 1 | |
| 질환 | postoperative pain
|
C0030201
Pain, Postoperative
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | numbness
|
C0020580
Hypesthesia
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | pain
|
C0030193
Pain
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | tunnel seromas
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | implant infection
|
C0588128
Infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal orthopedic fixation device
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | breast prosthesis
|
C0179412
Breast Prosthesis, Internal
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | breast implant
|
C0178391
breast implant procedure
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 기타 | patient
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Adolescent; Adult; Breast Implantation; Endoscopy; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Umbilicus
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Cutaneous fistula of the breast: A complication of cosmetic autologous fat transfer.
- Epidermal inclusion cyst after breast reduction mammoplasty.
- Penetrating globe injury following periocular hyaluronic acid filler injection: A case report.
- Clinical outcomes of synthetic absorbable mesh use in breast surgery: First case series in reconstruction and aesthetic mastopexy.