Clinical Evaluation of 310 Abdominoplasties and Measurement of Scar Level.

Annals of plastic surgery 2023 Vol.91(1) p. 14-27

Swanson E

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Most published studies on abdominoplasty focus on methods to reduce the risk of seromas. These methods include limited dissection (lipoabdominoplasty), quilting sutures, and preservation of the Scarpa fascia. Quantitative evaluation of the aesthetic result has been lacking.

[METHODS] A retrospective study was undertaken of all patients undergoing abdominoplasty in the author's practice from 2016 to 2022. A full abdominoplasty was performed, usually with liposuction (87%). All patients were treated under total intravenous anesthesia without paralysis or prone positioning. A single closed suction drain was removed 3 or 4 days after surgery. All procedures were performed as outpatients. Ultrasound surveillance was used to detect any deep venous thromboses. No patient received chemoprophylaxis. The operating table was flexed, often to 90°. Deep fascial anchoring sutures were used to attach the Scarpa fascia of the flap to the deep muscle fascia. Measurements of the scar level were made at intervals after surgery up to 1 year.

[RESULTS] Three hundred ten patients were evaluated, including 300 women. The mean follow-up time was 1 year. The overall complication rate, which included minor scar deformities, was 35.8%. Five deep venous thromboses were detected. There were no hematomas. Fifteen patients (4.8%) developed seromas that were successfully treated by aspiration. The mean vertical scar level 1 month after surgery was 9.9 cm (range, 6.1-12.9 cm). There was no significant change in scar level at subsequent follow-up times up to 1 year. By comparison, the scar level in published studies ranged from 8.6 to 14.1 cm.

[DISCUSSION] Avoidance of electrodissection reduces tissue trauma that causes seromas. Flexed patient positioning during surgery and deep fascial anchoring sutures are effective in keeping the scar low. By avoiding chemoprophylaxis, hematomas can be avoided. Limiting the dissection (lipoabdominoplasty), preserving the Scarpa fascia, and adding quilting (progressive tension) sutures are unnecessary.

[CONCLUSIONS] Total intravenous anesthesia offers important safety advantages. Avoiding electrodissection is effective in keeping seroma rates at a tolerable level (5%), and the scar low and more easily concealed. Alternative methods present disadvantages that may contribute to a suboptimal aesthetic result and require additional operating time.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 abdominoplasty 복부성형술 dict 3
시술 liposuction 지방흡입 dict 1
시술 flap 피판재건술 dict 1
해부 lipoabdominoplasty scispacy 1
해부 Scarpa fascia scispacy 1
해부 intravenous scispacy 1
해부 tissue scispacy 1
합병증 seromas scispacy 1
합병증 scar scispacy 1
합병증 hematomas scispacy 1
합병증 seroma 장액종 dict 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] Total scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] scispacy 1
질환 seromas C0262627
Seroma
scispacy 1
질환 paralysis C0522224
Paralysed
scispacy 1
질환 scar deformities scispacy 1
질환 hematomas C0018944
Hematoma
scispacy 1
질환 trauma C0043251
Wounds and Injuries
scispacy 1
질환 Scar scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 venous scispacy 1
기타 patient scispacy 1
기타 muscle fascia scispacy 1
기타 women scispacy 1
기타 venous thromboses scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Female; Cicatrix; Retrospective Studies; Seroma; Postoperative Complications; Abdominoplasty; Venous Thrombosis

📑 인용 관계

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문