Parental decision making in pediatric otoplasty: The role of shared decision making in parental decisional conflict and decisional regret.
Abstract
[OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS] To date, there has been little research on shared decision making and decisional outcomes in pediatric surgery. The objectives of this study were to describe the level of decisional conflict and decisional regret experienced by parents considering otoplasty for their children, and to determine if they are related to perceptions of shared decision making.
[STUDY DESIGN] Prospective cohort clinical study.
[METHODS] Sixty-five consecutive parents of children who underwent surgical consultation for otoplasty were prospectively enrolled. Participants completed the Demographic Form, the Decisional Conflict Scale, and the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire after the consultation visit. The consulting surgeons completed the physician version of the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire. Six months after surgery, parents completed the Decisional Regret Scale.
[RESULTS] The median decisional conflict was 15.63; 21 (32.8%) parents scored 25 or above, a previously defined cutoff indicating clinically significant decisional conflict. Parent ratings of shared decision making and decisional conflict were significantly negatively correlated (P < 0.001); however, there was no significant correlation between physician ratings of shared decision making and parental decisional conflict. Significant decisional regret was reported in two (3.2%) participants. Decisional regret and parent and physician ratings of shared decision making were both significantly negatively correlated (P = 0.044 and P = 0.001, respectively). Decisional regret and decisional conflict scores were significantly positively correlated (P = 0.001). Parent and physician ratings of shared decision making were correlated (intraclass correlation = 0.625, P < 0.001).
[CONCLUSION] Many parents experienced significant decisional conflict when making decisions about their child's elective surgical treatment. Fewer parents experienced significant decisional regret after the procedure. Parents who perceived themselves as being more involved in the decision making process reported less decisional conflict and decisional regret. Parents and physicians had varied perceptions of the degree of shared decision making. Future research should develop interventions to increase parents' involvement in decision making and explore the influence of significant decisional conflict and decisional regret on health outcomes.
[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] 2b. Laryngoscope, 126:S5-S13, 2016.
[STUDY DESIGN] Prospective cohort clinical study.
[METHODS] Sixty-five consecutive parents of children who underwent surgical consultation for otoplasty were prospectively enrolled. Participants completed the Demographic Form, the Decisional Conflict Scale, and the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire after the consultation visit. The consulting surgeons completed the physician version of the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire. Six months after surgery, parents completed the Decisional Regret Scale.
[RESULTS] The median decisional conflict was 15.63; 21 (32.8%) parents scored 25 or above, a previously defined cutoff indicating clinically significant decisional conflict. Parent ratings of shared decision making and decisional conflict were significantly negatively correlated (P < 0.001); however, there was no significant correlation between physician ratings of shared decision making and parental decisional conflict. Significant decisional regret was reported in two (3.2%) participants. Decisional regret and parent and physician ratings of shared decision making were both significantly negatively correlated (P = 0.044 and P = 0.001, respectively). Decisional regret and decisional conflict scores were significantly positively correlated (P = 0.001). Parent and physician ratings of shared decision making were correlated (intraclass correlation = 0.625, P < 0.001).
[CONCLUSION] Many parents experienced significant decisional conflict when making decisions about their child's elective surgical treatment. Fewer parents experienced significant decisional regret after the procedure. Parents who perceived themselves as being more involved in the decision making process reported less decisional conflict and decisional regret. Parents and physicians had varied perceptions of the degree of shared decision making. Future research should develop interventions to increase parents' involvement in decision making and explore the influence of significant decisional conflict and decisional regret on health outcomes.
[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] 2b. Laryngoscope, 126:S5-S13, 2016.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | otoplasty
|
귀성형술 | dict | 3 | |
| 약물 | 0.625
|
C4517467
0.625
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 약물 | [OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | children
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Child; Decision Making; Ear, External; Elective Surgical Procedures; Humans; Parents; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Surgery, Plastic; Surveys and Questionnaires
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Otoplasty for prominent ear: A systematic review of surgical techniques.
- [Pressure ulcer following compression otoplasty garment: A rare but severe case report].
- A Novel Approach to Upper Pole Correction in Otoplasty: Addressing the Surprisingly Neglected Inferior Crus.
- Assessing Patient Satisfaction Following Otoplasty: A Social Media Analysis.
- Perioperative Analgesia and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Management in Otoplasty: A Systematic Review.