Evidence-Based Practice in Liposuction.

Annals of plastic surgery 2018 Vol.80(6S Suppl 6) p. S403-S405

Collins PS, Moyer KE

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] The goal of this study is to examine the existing peer reviewed literature comparing modern adjunctive techniques in liposuction including laser-assisted liposuction (LAL) and ultrasound-assisted liposuction (UAL) to standard suction-assisted liposuction (SAL). We intend to interpret these findings into a literature-based clinical application to influence practice patterns.

[METHODS] A literature review was conducted using a keyword search in PubMed. Keyword search items included liposuction, lipoplasty, suction assisted liposuction, ultrasound assisted liposuction, laser assisted liposuction, tumescent, liposuction comparison, liposuction review, and combinations therein. Exclusion criteria included articles with a primary focus on histologic effects of energy devices, primary animal models, primary opinion papers with no reference to available data, and industry-sponsored publications. Inclusion criteria included articles with direct comparison of liposuction modalities, randomized or blinded studies, and studies with objective outcomes.

[RESULTS] Twenty-five articles that met the inclusion criteria comparing SAL to UAL or LAL out of 9972 articles identified were obtained. The selected literature was assigned into 3 categories: evidence demonstrating an advantage of 1 modality (SAL, UAL, or LAL) over another, evidence that showed no benefit of 1 modality over another, and evidence that demonstrated risks of complications of 1 modality over another.

[CONCLUSIONS] The benefits of UAL and LAL over SAL include the following: (1) UAL over SAL in the treatment of gynecomastia, (2) LAL and UAL over SAL with decreased hemoglobin/hematocrit in high-volume lipoaspirates, and (3) LAL over SAL with skin tightening in select areas specifically the submental area. Otherwise, the literature demonstrates equivocal results among the described techniques with no clear benefit to set one apart from the other. There appears to be no demonstrable added benefit to the addition of either UAL or LAL that would urge a change in practice patterns outside the exceptions listed.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 liposuction 지방흡입 dict 12
시술 sal 지방흡입 dict 7
시술 lipoplasty 지방흡입 dict 1
해부 UAL → ultrasound-assisted liposuction scispacy 1
해부 skin scispacy 1
합병증 tumescent scispacy 1
합병증 UAL → ultrasound-assisted liposuction scispacy 1
약물 UAL or LAL scispacy 1
약물 UAL → ultrasound-assisted liposuction scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] scispacy 1
질환 gynecomastia C0018418
Gynecomastia
scispacy 1
질환 LAL → laser-assisted liposuction scispacy 1
질환 UAL → ultrasound-assisted liposuction scispacy 1
기타 UAL → ultrasound-assisted liposuction scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Evidence-Based Practice; Humans; Lasers; Lipectomy; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Suction; Ultrasonography, Interventional

📑 인용 관계

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문