Efficacy of Nanofat in Wound Healing: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Abstract
[INTRODUCTION] Nanofat has been shown to contain a variety of growth factors, anti-inflammatory mediators, and adipose-derived stem cells, all of which may significantly contribute to the wound healing process. However, there is limited comparative clinical evidence supporting its use. This study aims to evaluate the effects of nanofat on wound healing in abdominoplasty by comparing outcomes between nanofat-treated and non-treated wounds.
[METHODS] A prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted using a split-wound model. Each wound was divided and randomized into a nanofat-treated side and a non-nanofat control side. Nanofat was prepared and injected along the wound margins using a standardized dose. Both patients and the surgeons evaluating the wounds were blinded to the treatment allocation. Wound outcomes were assessed six months postoperatively using the Observer Scale of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS).
[RESULTS] Fifty lipoabdominoplasty patients were included in the study. Wound outcomes were significantly better in the nanofat group compared to the non-nanofat group across all assessed parameters, including vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface area, and overall opinion (p<0.001). No oil cysts or fat necrosis were observed in the nanofat group.
[CONCLUSIONS] Nanofat significantly improved wound outcomes in abdominoplasty patients without associated complications such as oil cysts or fat necrosis.
[METHODS] A prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted using a split-wound model. Each wound was divided and randomized into a nanofat-treated side and a non-nanofat control side. Nanofat was prepared and injected along the wound margins using a standardized dose. Both patients and the surgeons evaluating the wounds were blinded to the treatment allocation. Wound outcomes were assessed six months postoperatively using the Observer Scale of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS).
[RESULTS] Fifty lipoabdominoplasty patients were included in the study. Wound outcomes were significantly better in the nanofat group compared to the non-nanofat group across all assessed parameters, including vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface area, and overall opinion (p<0.001). No oil cysts or fat necrosis were observed in the nanofat group.
[CONCLUSIONS] Nanofat significantly improved wound outcomes in abdominoplasty patients without associated complications such as oil cysts or fat necrosis.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | abdominoplasty
|
복부성형술 | dict | 2 | |
| 합병증 | necrosis
|
괴사 | dict | 2 | |
| 해부 | adipose-derived stem cells
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | oil
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | fat
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | Wound
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | wounds
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | wound margins
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | pigmentation
|
색소침착 | dict | 1 | |
| 약물 | [INTRODUCTION] Nanofat
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | POSAS
→ Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | abdominoplasty patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | Patient
|
scispacy | 1 |
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Case report of a rare soft tissue tuberculosis in a patient undergoing lipoabdominoplasty.
- What is the potential role of the nonopioid suzetrigine in pain management?
- Pedicled extensor digitorum brevis flap for the distal third lower limb reconstruction: A review of the literature.
- Ex Vivo and In Vivo Histological Evaluation of a 3-μm Wavelength, 40-μm Spot Size Fractional Laser System for Dermatology.
- Red and near-infrared photobiomodulation for burn, hypertrophic, and post-surgical scars: a scoping review of clinical trials.