Efficacy of Renuvion Helium Plasma to Improve the Appearance of Loose Skin in Patients Undergoing Abdominoplasty After Massive Weight Loss: A Prospective Controlled Randomized Study.
Abstract
[INTRODUCTION] Renuvion was the first FDA approved helium plasma device utilized for subdermal tissue heating to reduce skin laxity. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that the use of Renuvion improves the outcomes, skin quality and reduces the edema faster after lipoabdominoplasty.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] Patients with abdominal skin laxity after a weight loss of at least 20 kg, nonsmokers, without major comorbidities, with a minimum 2-year follow-up and standardized pre- and postoperative photographs were included in this study. They were randomly divided in two groups: group 1, lipoabdominoplasty alone; group 2, lipoabdominoplasty and Renuvion. Both the patients and two of the authors measuring outcomes were blinded to the treatment methods. Postoperatively, all patients were administered the BODY-Q satisfaction with abdomen and appraisal of excess skin scales. Two independent plastic surgeons reviewed photographs, rating the outcomes on a 1-5 visual analog scale (VAS). Pinch test and ultrasound of the subcutaneous tissue were also performed.
[RESULTS] Seventy-six patients were enrolled, 33 males and 43 females, aged between 20 and 50 years. The BODY-Q satisfaction with abdomen scores were higher in group 2 in the 6-month (p = 0.007), 1-year (p = 0.021) and 2-year (p = 0.024) evaluations. The BODY-Q appraisal of excess skin scores were significantly higher in group 2 in the 6-month (p < 0.0001), 1-year (p < 0.0001) and 2-year (p < 0.0001) postoperative evaluations. The VAS scale reported higher scores in group 2 (p = 0.01). Ultrasound at 6 months postoperatively demonstrated lower subcutaneous thickness in group 2 (31 mm ± 2.8 SD) compared to group 1 (42 mm ± 1.4 SD) implying a faster edema reabsorption.
[CONCLUSIONS] Data showed a significantly greater improvement of abdominal skin laxity in patients treated with Renuvion compared to those who underwent lipoabdominoplasty alone. This is the first prospective randomized study about Renuvion and lipoabdominoplasty and could be considered a pilot study.
[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V] This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] Patients with abdominal skin laxity after a weight loss of at least 20 kg, nonsmokers, without major comorbidities, with a minimum 2-year follow-up and standardized pre- and postoperative photographs were included in this study. They were randomly divided in two groups: group 1, lipoabdominoplasty alone; group 2, lipoabdominoplasty and Renuvion. Both the patients and two of the authors measuring outcomes were blinded to the treatment methods. Postoperatively, all patients were administered the BODY-Q satisfaction with abdomen and appraisal of excess skin scales. Two independent plastic surgeons reviewed photographs, rating the outcomes on a 1-5 visual analog scale (VAS). Pinch test and ultrasound of the subcutaneous tissue were also performed.
[RESULTS] Seventy-six patients were enrolled, 33 males and 43 females, aged between 20 and 50 years. The BODY-Q satisfaction with abdomen scores were higher in group 2 in the 6-month (p = 0.007), 1-year (p = 0.021) and 2-year (p = 0.024) evaluations. The BODY-Q appraisal of excess skin scores were significantly higher in group 2 in the 6-month (p < 0.0001), 1-year (p < 0.0001) and 2-year (p < 0.0001) postoperative evaluations. The VAS scale reported higher scores in group 2 (p = 0.01). Ultrasound at 6 months postoperatively demonstrated lower subcutaneous thickness in group 2 (31 mm ± 2.8 SD) compared to group 1 (42 mm ± 1.4 SD) implying a faster edema reabsorption.
[CONCLUSIONS] Data showed a significantly greater improvement of abdominal skin laxity in patients treated with Renuvion compared to those who underwent lipoabdominoplasty alone. This is the first prospective randomized study about Renuvion and lipoabdominoplasty and could be considered a pilot study.
[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V] This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 해부 | subcutaneous
|
피하조직 | dict | 2 | |
| 시술 | abdominoplasty
|
복부성형술 | dict | 1 | |
| 해부 | subdermal
|
피하조직 | dict | 1 | |
| 해부 | Plasma
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | Skin
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | subdermal tissue
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | lipoabdominoplasty
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | subcutaneous tissue
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | abdomen
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | edema
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | lipoabdominoplasty
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | abdomen
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | Helium
|
C0018880
helium
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 약물 | [INTRODUCTION]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | helium plasma
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS] Data
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | edema
|
C0013604
Edema
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | weight loss
|
C1262477
Weight Loss
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 기타 | Patients
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Humans; Female; Male; Adult; Prospective Studies; Middle Aged; Weight Loss; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult; Abdominoplasty; Helium; Esthetics; Lipoabdominoplasty; Follow-Up Studies; Patient Satisfaction
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Case report of a rare soft tissue tuberculosis in a patient undergoing lipoabdominoplasty.
- What is the potential role of the nonopioid suzetrigine in pain management?
- Implant-based versus autologous mastopexy after massive weight loss: Complications and patient satisfaction.
- Hyperhidrosis: Prevalence, Diagnosis, and Stepwise Treatment.
- Application of the SCIA-Pure Skin Perforator Flap in Bilateral Upper Eyelid Reconstruction: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.