Limitations of Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia Following Abdominoplasty.

Annals of plastic surgery 2024 Vol.93(3) p. 283-289

Pfeiler PP, Rieder P, Kimelman M, Moog P, Dornseifer U

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Effective postoperative pain management is essential for patient satisfaction and an uneventful postoperative course, particularly in body contouring procedures. Systemic analgesic regimens can be supported by regional procedures, such as the transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block, but these have a limited duration of action. In contrast, thoracic epidural analgesia offers the possibility of a longer-lasting, individualized regional anesthesia administered by a patient-controlled analgesia pump.

[OBJECTIVES] The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a patient-controlled epidural analgesia to better classify the clinical value of this procedure in abdominoplasties.

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] This work reviewed the digital medical charts of patients who underwent selective abdominoplasty without combined surgical procedures between September 2018 and August 2022. Evaluated data comprise the postoperative analgesia regimen, including on-demand medication, mobilization time, inpatient length of stay, and clinical outcome. The patients were grouped by the presence of a thoracic epidural catheter. This catheter was placed before anesthetic induction and a saturation dose was preoperatively applied. Postoperative PCEA patients received a basal rate and could independently administer boluses. Basal rate was individually adjusted during daily additional pain visits.

[RESULTS] The study cohort included 112 patients. Significant differences in the demand for supportive nonepidural opiate medication were shown between the patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) group (n = 57) and the non-PCEA group (n = 55), depending on the time after surgery. PCEA patients demanded less medication during the early postoperative days (POD 0: PCEA 0.13 (±0.99) mg vs non-PCEA 2.59 (±4.55) mg, P = 0.001; POD 1: PCEA 0.79 mg (±3.06) vs non-PCEA 2.73 (±3.98) mg, P = 0.005), but they required more during the later postoperative phase (POD 3: PCEA 2.76 (±5.60) mg vs non-PCEA 0.61 (±2.01) mg, P = 0.008; POD 4: PCEA 1.64 (±3.82) mg vs non-PCEA 0.07 (±2.01) mg, P = 0.003). In addition, PCEA patients achieved full mobilization later (PCEA 2.67 (±0.82) days vs non-PCEA 1.78 (±1.09) days, P = 0.001) and were discharged later (PCEA 4.84 (±1.23) days vs non-PCEA 4.31 (±1.37) days, P = 0.005).

[CONCLUSION] Because the postoperative benefits of PCEA are limited to potent analgesia immediately after abdominoplasty, less cumbersome, time-limited regional anesthesia procedures (such as TAP block) appear not only adequate but also more effective.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 abdominoplasty 복부성형술 dict 3
해부 Epidural scispacy 1
해부 abdominis scispacy 1
해부 thoracic epidural scispacy 1
합병증 thoracic epidural scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] scispacy 1
약물 [OBJECTIVES] scispacy 1
약물 patient-controlled epidural analgesia scispacy 1
약물 PCEA → patient-controlled epidural analgesia scispacy 1
약물 PCEA 2.76 scispacy 1
약물 PCEA 1.64 scispacy 1
질환 postoperative pain C0030201
Pain, Postoperative
scispacy 1
질환 pain C0030193
Pain
scispacy 1
기타 patient scispacy 1
기타 TAP → transverse abdominis plane scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 POD 1 scispacy 1
기타 POD 4 scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Abdominoplasty; Postoperative Pain; Female; Middle Aged; Analgesia, Epidural; Male; Retrospective Studies; Adult; Pain Measurement; Pain Management

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문