Abdominoplasty with Scarpa Fascia Preservation: Randomized Controlled Trial with Assessment of Scar Quality and Cutaneous Sensibility.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Scarpa fascia preservation during abdominoplasty has been shown to reduce complications associated with the traditional technique. As an extension of a previously published randomized controlled trial, this study aims to clarify whether preservation of Scarpa fascia during abdominoplasty has an influence on scar quality or sensibility recovery.
[METHODS] This was a single-center clinical trial, involving 160 patients randomly assigned to one of two surgical procedures: classic full abdominoplasty (group A) and abdominoplasty with preservation of Scarpa fascia (group B). Patients were later convoked to assess scar quality and abdominal cutaneous sensibility. Scar quality was evaluated through the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Cutaneous sensibility was measured on the upper and lower abdomen, using light touch, Semmes-Weinstein testing (5.07/10-g monofilament), and a 25-gauge needle.
[RESULTS] A total of 99 patients (group A, 54 patients; group B, 45 patients) responded to contact, with a mean follow-up time of 44 months. Concerning scar quality, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale scores were similar between groups. On the upper abdomen, there was a statistically significant difference between groups on cutaneous sensibility, on the examination with the Semmes-Weinstein 5.07/10-g monofilament (group A, 79.6 percent; group B, 93.3 percent; p = 0.046) and pain (group A, 90.7 percent; group B, 100 percent; p = 0.044). No statistically significant differences were found between groups on the lower abdomen. A considerable proportion of patients (two-thirds) still presented sensibility alterations in the subumbilical area 3½ years after abdominoplasty.
[CONCLUSION] Scarpa fascia preservation during abdominoplasty does not influence scar quality, but it improves sensibility recovery in the supraumbilical area.
[CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] Therapeutic, II.
[METHODS] This was a single-center clinical trial, involving 160 patients randomly assigned to one of two surgical procedures: classic full abdominoplasty (group A) and abdominoplasty with preservation of Scarpa fascia (group B). Patients were later convoked to assess scar quality and abdominal cutaneous sensibility. Scar quality was evaluated through the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Cutaneous sensibility was measured on the upper and lower abdomen, using light touch, Semmes-Weinstein testing (5.07/10-g monofilament), and a 25-gauge needle.
[RESULTS] A total of 99 patients (group A, 54 patients; group B, 45 patients) responded to contact, with a mean follow-up time of 44 months. Concerning scar quality, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale scores were similar between groups. On the upper abdomen, there was a statistically significant difference between groups on cutaneous sensibility, on the examination with the Semmes-Weinstein 5.07/10-g monofilament (group A, 79.6 percent; group B, 93.3 percent; p = 0.046) and pain (group A, 90.7 percent; group B, 100 percent; p = 0.044). No statistically significant differences were found between groups on the lower abdomen. A considerable proportion of patients (two-thirds) still presented sensibility alterations in the subumbilical area 3½ years after abdominoplasty.
[CONCLUSION] Scarpa fascia preservation during abdominoplasty does not influence scar quality, but it improves sensibility recovery in the supraumbilical area.
[CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] Therapeutic, II.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | abdominoplasty
|
복부성형술 | dict | 7 | |
| 해부 | Fascia
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | upper abdomen
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | scar
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | abdominal cutaneous
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | upper
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | abdomen
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND] Scarpa fascia
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [RESULTS] A
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | abdominal cutaneous sensibility
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | Cutaneous sensibility
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | pain
|
C0030193
Pain
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | Scar
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | Patient
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Abdominal Wall; Abdominoplasty; Adult; Cicatrix; Fascia; Fasciotomy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Middle Aged; Organ Sparing Treatments; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Skin; Touch; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
📑 인용 관계
이 논문을 인용한 후속 연구 3
- Letter in Reply: Comment on "Thermal Precision and Fluid Dynamics in Abdominoplasty: A Cautious Look…
- High-Precision Electrosurgical Scalpel for Scarpa Sparing Abdominoplasty - Pilot Randomized Controll…
- Cutaneous Sensory Loss After Lipoabdominoplasty: A Prospective Quantitative Mapping Study with Funct…
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Case report of a rare soft tissue tuberculosis in a patient undergoing lipoabdominoplasty.
- What is the potential role of the nonopioid suzetrigine in pain management?
- Ex Vivo and In Vivo Histological Evaluation of a 3-μm Wavelength, 40-μm Spot Size Fractional Laser System for Dermatology.
- Correspondence on "Lymphatic pathway remodeling in the supraumbilical region after abdominoplasty: A prospective cohort study".
- Sculpting Success-The TULUANHA: Modified TULUA Lipo-Abdominoplasty in Post-Bariatric Body Contouring.