Abdominoplasty With Scarpa Fascia Preservation: Prospective Comparative Study of Suction Drain Number.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Abdominoplasty is becoming increasingly more common, with seroma being the most frequent complication. Suction drains are used very often as a method to prevent seroma formation, and it has been suggested that techniques using Scarpa fascia preservation and closed-suction drains have lower seroma rates than other approaches. However few studies have addressed parameters that may affect drain efficiency. A prospective comparative study was conducted to determine if applying 2 or 3 closed-suction drains, after an abdominoplasty with Scarpa fascia preservation, has any effect on several outcomes.
[METHODS] This was a single-center study conducted from September 2016 to March 2019. Patients were allocated according to choice to 1 of the 2 surgeons involved in the study, each responsible for 1 group: abdominoplasty with Scarpa fascia preservation with 2 closed-suction drains placed postoperatively (group A) or with 3 closed-suction drains (group B). A comparative analysis of selected variables was done between both groups, including time to drain removal, total and daily drain output, duration of hospital stay, emergency department visit, readmission to the hospital, secondary surgical procedure, and incidence of postoperative local and systemic complications.
[RESULTS] A total of 73 abdominoplasties with Scarpa fascia preservation were performed in women (group A, 33 patients; group B, 40 patients). General characteristics of group A and B were similar. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in any of the determined variables, namely, main outcomes (total and daily drain output, time to drain removal) or complications (local or systemic).
[CONCLUSIONS] Our results suggest that using 3 closed-suction drains postabdominoplasty with Scarpa fascia preservation has no advantages in total and daily drain output, time to drain removal, or complications when compared with the usual 2 drains approach.
[METHODS] This was a single-center study conducted from September 2016 to March 2019. Patients were allocated according to choice to 1 of the 2 surgeons involved in the study, each responsible for 1 group: abdominoplasty with Scarpa fascia preservation with 2 closed-suction drains placed postoperatively (group A) or with 3 closed-suction drains (group B). A comparative analysis of selected variables was done between both groups, including time to drain removal, total and daily drain output, duration of hospital stay, emergency department visit, readmission to the hospital, secondary surgical procedure, and incidence of postoperative local and systemic complications.
[RESULTS] A total of 73 abdominoplasties with Scarpa fascia preservation were performed in women (group A, 33 patients; group B, 40 patients). General characteristics of group A and B were similar. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in any of the determined variables, namely, main outcomes (total and daily drain output, time to drain removal) or complications (local or systemic).
[CONCLUSIONS] Our results suggest that using 3 closed-suction drains postabdominoplasty with Scarpa fascia preservation has no advantages in total and daily drain output, time to drain removal, or complications when compared with the usual 2 drains approach.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | abdominoplasty
|
복부성형술 | dict | 4 | |
| 합병증 | seroma
|
장액종 | dict | 3 | |
| 해부 | Fascia
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND] Abdominoplasty
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | closed-suction drains have
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [RESULTS] A
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | postabdominoplasty
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | Scarpa fascia
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | Patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | women
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Abdominoplasty; Drainage; Fascia; Female; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Seroma; Suction
📑 인용 관계
이 논문을 인용한 후속 연구 4
- Letter in Reply: Comment on "Thermal Precision and Fluid Dynamics in Abdominoplasty: A Cautious Look…
- High-Precision Electrosurgical Scalpel for Scarpa Sparing Abdominoplasty - Pilot Randomized Controll…
- Comparative Efficacy of Seroma Prevention Strategies in Abdominoplasty with Liposuction: A Systemati…
- Do Perfusion Studies Support Scarpa Fascia Preservation in Abdominoplasty?
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Case report of a rare soft tissue tuberculosis in a patient undergoing lipoabdominoplasty.
- What is the potential role of the nonopioid suzetrigine in pain management?
- Clinical outcomes of synthetic absorbable mesh use in breast surgery: First case series in reconstruction and aesthetic mastopexy.
- Ex Vivo and In Vivo Histological Evaluation of a 3-μm Wavelength, 40-μm Spot Size Fractional Laser System for Dermatology.
- GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use and Wound Outcomes After Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.