Efficacy and Safety of Scarpa Fascia Preservation During Abdominoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Abstract
[INTRODUCTION] Scarpa fascia preservation might be a promising approach to reduce seroma and other complications after abdominoplasty. However, the results remained controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of scarpa fascia preservation in patients with abdominoplasty.
[METHODS] PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials and clinical controlled trials assessing the effect of scarpa fascia preservation versus control (without scarpa fascia) during abdominoplasty were included. Two investigators independently searched articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. The primary outcomes were seroma and hematoma/bleeding. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effect model.
[RESULTS] Four studies involving 630 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with the control group, scarpa fascia preservation was associated with a significant reduced seroma (OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.06-0.43; P = 0.0004), time until drain removal (std. mean difference = -0.92; 95% CI -1.31 to -0.54; P<0.00001;), drain output (std. mean difference = -0.92; 95% CI -1.38 to -0.45; P = 0.0001), and hospital stay (std. mean difference = -0.93; 95% CI -1.48 to -0.39; P = 0.0008), but it failed to alter hematoma/bleeding (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.09-2.38; P = 0.36), infection (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.11-1.25; P = 0.11), and suture rupture (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.12-3.73; P = 0.65) in patients with abdominoplasty.
[CONCLUSIONS] Scarpa fascia preservation was associated with a significant decreased seroma, time until drain removal, drain output, and hospital stay, but could not change hematoma/bleeding, infection and suture rupture following abdominoplasty. Scarpa fascia preservation should be recommended during abdominoplasty.
[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II] This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
[METHODS] PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials and clinical controlled trials assessing the effect of scarpa fascia preservation versus control (without scarpa fascia) during abdominoplasty were included. Two investigators independently searched articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. The primary outcomes were seroma and hematoma/bleeding. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effect model.
[RESULTS] Four studies involving 630 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with the control group, scarpa fascia preservation was associated with a significant reduced seroma (OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.06-0.43; P = 0.0004), time until drain removal (std. mean difference = -0.92; 95% CI -1.31 to -0.54; P<0.00001;), drain output (std. mean difference = -0.92; 95% CI -1.38 to -0.45; P = 0.0001), and hospital stay (std. mean difference = -0.93; 95% CI -1.48 to -0.39; P = 0.0008), but it failed to alter hematoma/bleeding (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.09-2.38; P = 0.36), infection (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.11-1.25; P = 0.11), and suture rupture (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.12-3.73; P = 0.65) in patients with abdominoplasty.
[CONCLUSIONS] Scarpa fascia preservation was associated with a significant decreased seroma, time until drain removal, drain output, and hospital stay, but could not change hematoma/bleeding, infection and suture rupture following abdominoplasty. Scarpa fascia preservation should be recommended during abdominoplasty.
[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II] This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | abdominoplasty
|
복부성형술 | dict | 7 | |
| 합병증 | seroma
|
장액종 | dict | 4 | |
| 합병증 | hematoma
|
혈종 | dict | 3 | |
| 합병증 | infection
|
감염 | dict | 2 | |
| 약물 | [INTRODUCTION] Scarpa fascia
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | EMbase
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | CI -1.38
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS] Scarpa fascia
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | suture rupture
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | rupture
|
C3203359
Rupture
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 기타 | Fascia
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | scarpa fascia
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Abdominoplasty; Fascia; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Organ Sparing Treatments; Postoperative Complications; Seroma; Tensile Strength; Wound Healing
📑 인용 관계
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Penetrating globe injury following periocular hyaluronic acid filler injection: A case report.
- Case report of a rare soft tissue tuberculosis in a patient undergoing lipoabdominoplasty.
- What is the potential role of the nonopioid suzetrigine in pain management?
- Otoplasty for prominent ear: A systematic review of surgical techniques.
- Combined minimally invasive lymphatic microsurgery and aligned nanofibrillar collagen scaffold for refractory post-traumatic eyelid lymphedema: A case report.