Outcomes and Safety of the Combined Abdominoplasty-Hysterectomy: A Preliminary Study.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Abdominoplasty (ABP) at the time of hysterectomy (HYS) has been described in the literature since 1986 and is being increasingly requested by patients. However, outcomes of the combined procedure have not been thoroughly explored.
[METHODS] The authors reviewed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database and identified each ABP, HYS, and combined ABP-HYS performed between 2005 and 2012. The incidence of complications in each of the three procedures was calculated, and a multiplicative-risk model was used to calculate the probability of a complication for a patient undergoing distinct HYS and ABP on different dates. One-sample binomial hypothesis tests were performed to determine statistical significance.
[RESULTS] There were 1325 ABP cases, 12,173 HYS cases, and 143 ABP-HYS cases identified. Surgical complications occurred in 7.7 % of patients undergoing an ABP-HYS, while the calculated risk of a surgical complication was 12.5 % (p = 0.0407) for patients undergoing separate ABP and HYS procedures. The mean operative time was significantly lower for an ABP-HYS at 238 vs. 270 min for separate ABP and HYS procedures (p < 0.0001), and the mean time under anesthesia was significantly lower at 295 vs. 364 min (p < 0.0001).
[CONCLUSIONS] A combined ABP-HYS has a lower incidence of surgical complications than separate ABP and HYS procedures performed on different dates. These data should not encourage all patients to elect a combined ABP-HYS, if only undergoing a HYS, as the combined procedure is associated with increased risks when compared to either isolated individual procedure. However, in patients who are planning on undergoing both procedures on separate dates, a combined ABP-HYS is a safe option that will result in fewer surgical complications, less operative time, less time under anesthesia, and a trend towards fewer days in the hospital.
[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV] This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
[METHODS] The authors reviewed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database and identified each ABP, HYS, and combined ABP-HYS performed between 2005 and 2012. The incidence of complications in each of the three procedures was calculated, and a multiplicative-risk model was used to calculate the probability of a complication for a patient undergoing distinct HYS and ABP on different dates. One-sample binomial hypothesis tests were performed to determine statistical significance.
[RESULTS] There were 1325 ABP cases, 12,173 HYS cases, and 143 ABP-HYS cases identified. Surgical complications occurred in 7.7 % of patients undergoing an ABP-HYS, while the calculated risk of a surgical complication was 12.5 % (p = 0.0407) for patients undergoing separate ABP and HYS procedures. The mean operative time was significantly lower for an ABP-HYS at 238 vs. 270 min for separate ABP and HYS procedures (p < 0.0001), and the mean time under anesthesia was significantly lower at 295 vs. 364 min (p < 0.0001).
[CONCLUSIONS] A combined ABP-HYS has a lower incidence of surgical complications than separate ABP and HYS procedures performed on different dates. These data should not encourage all patients to elect a combined ABP-HYS, if only undergoing a HYS, as the combined procedure is associated with increased risks when compared to either isolated individual procedure. However, in patients who are planning on undergoing both procedures on separate dates, a combined ABP-HYS is a safe option that will result in fewer surgical complications, less operative time, less time under anesthesia, and a trend towards fewer days in the hospital.
[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV] This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | abdominoplasty
|
복부성형술 | dict | 2 | |
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND] Abdominoplasty
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [RESULTS]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS] A
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | ABP
→ Abdominoplasty
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patient
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Abdominoplasty; Adult; Cohort Studies; Databases, Factual; Esthetics; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hysterectomy; Middle Aged; Operative Time; Patient Safety; Patient Selection; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Treatment Outcome; Wound Healing
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Case report of a rare soft tissue tuberculosis in a patient undergoing lipoabdominoplasty.
- What is the potential role of the nonopioid suzetrigine in pain management?
- Ex Vivo and In Vivo Histological Evaluation of a 3-μm Wavelength, 40-μm Spot Size Fractional Laser System for Dermatology.
- Correspondence on "Lymphatic pathway remodeling in the supraumbilical region after abdominoplasty: A prospective cohort study".
- Sculpting Success-The TULUANHA: Modified TULUA Lipo-Abdominoplasty in Post-Bariatric Body Contouring.