Modified aesthetic abdominoplasty approach in perforator free-flap breast reconstruction: Impact of drain free donor site on patient outcomes.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS 2015 Vol.68(6) p. 800-9

Mohan AT, Rammos CK, Gaba P, Schupbach J, Goede WJ, Ballman K, Batdorf N, Cheng A, Saint-Cyr M

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] The use of progressive tension sutures alone has been shown to be comparable to using abdominal drains in aesthetic abdominoplasty. This study reviews outcomes with the use of barbed progressive tension suture technique without drains in DIEP donor site closure compared to standard closure with drains.

[METHODS] A two year retrospective review was conducted of DIEP flap reconstructions in the enhanced recovery program at Mayo Clinic, Rochester (USA). Donor site closure was divided into barbed progressive tension sutures (B-PTS) without drains, and standard abdominal closure with drains(S-AD). Demographics, perioperative data and donor site complications were documented.

[RESULTS] 93 patients were included in the study, 42 in the B-PTS no drain group and 51 in the S-AD with drains. 81% of all procedures were bilateral and 39% were immediate. Patients were discharged faster to the ward postoperatively and total hospital admission was reduced in the B-PTS group, 3.7 (SD = 1.4) days versus 4.7 (SD = 2.1) days in the standard group (P = 0 < 0.001 and 0.004 respectively). Less morphine was required postoperative day (POD) 1, 2 and 3 (P = 0.04, 0.03, 0.02 respectively), and time to mobilize was quicker but not statistically significant (P = 0.09) in the B-PTS group. Overall there were 18 patients in the S-AD group who had complications versus 9 in the B-PTS group (P = 0.14). The incidence of complications occurring within 30 days were lower in the B-PTS group (P = 0.05). The overall seroma rate was 5.4% and rates in the B-PTS group was 2.4% versus 7.8% in the S-AD group, P = 0.37.

[CONCLUSIONS] Use of barbed progressive tension sutures for abdominal closure after DIEP flap harvest can obviate the need for abdominal drains, reduce postoperative pain and encourage early discharge from the hospital without an increased risk in complications.

[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] III.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 abdominoplasty 복부성형술 dict 2
시술 diep flap 피판재건술 dict 2
시술 flap 피판재건술 dict 1
해부 breast 유방 dict 1
해부 abdominal scispacy 1
합병증 seroma 장액종 dict 1
합병증 perforator free-flap scispacy 1
합병증 abdominal drains scispacy 1
합병증 DIEP donor scispacy 1
합병증 abdominal scispacy 1
약물 morphine C0026549
morphine
scispacy 1
약물 barbed scispacy 1
약물 [RESULTS] 93 scispacy 1
질환 DIEP C0082274
diclofenac epolamine
scispacy 1
질환 postoperative pain C0030201
Pain, Postoperative
scispacy 1
질환 Mayo scispacy 1
기타 B-PTS → barbed progressive tension sutures scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques; Abdominoplasty; Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Drainage; Female; Free Tissue Flaps; Humans; Length of Stay; Mammaplasty; Middle Aged; Morphine; Postoperative Pain; Perforator Flap; Retrospective Studies; Seroma; Suture Techniques; Sutures; Tissue and Organ Harvesting; Transplant Donor Site

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문