Modified aesthetic abdominoplasty approach in perforator free-flap breast reconstruction: Impact of drain free donor site on patient outcomes.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] The use of progressive tension sutures alone has been shown to be comparable to using abdominal drains in aesthetic abdominoplasty. This study reviews outcomes with the use of barbed progressive tension suture technique without drains in DIEP donor site closure compared to standard closure with drains.
[METHODS] A two year retrospective review was conducted of DIEP flap reconstructions in the enhanced recovery program at Mayo Clinic, Rochester (USA). Donor site closure was divided into barbed progressive tension sutures (B-PTS) without drains, and standard abdominal closure with drains(S-AD). Demographics, perioperative data and donor site complications were documented.
[RESULTS] 93 patients were included in the study, 42 in the B-PTS no drain group and 51 in the S-AD with drains. 81% of all procedures were bilateral and 39% were immediate. Patients were discharged faster to the ward postoperatively and total hospital admission was reduced in the B-PTS group, 3.7 (SD = 1.4) days versus 4.7 (SD = 2.1) days in the standard group (P = 0 < 0.001 and 0.004 respectively). Less morphine was required postoperative day (POD) 1, 2 and 3 (P = 0.04, 0.03, 0.02 respectively), and time to mobilize was quicker but not statistically significant (P = 0.09) in the B-PTS group. Overall there were 18 patients in the S-AD group who had complications versus 9 in the B-PTS group (P = 0.14). The incidence of complications occurring within 30 days were lower in the B-PTS group (P = 0.05). The overall seroma rate was 5.4% and rates in the B-PTS group was 2.4% versus 7.8% in the S-AD group, P = 0.37.
[CONCLUSIONS] Use of barbed progressive tension sutures for abdominal closure after DIEP flap harvest can obviate the need for abdominal drains, reduce postoperative pain and encourage early discharge from the hospital without an increased risk in complications.
[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] III.
[METHODS] A two year retrospective review was conducted of DIEP flap reconstructions in the enhanced recovery program at Mayo Clinic, Rochester (USA). Donor site closure was divided into barbed progressive tension sutures (B-PTS) without drains, and standard abdominal closure with drains(S-AD). Demographics, perioperative data and donor site complications were documented.
[RESULTS] 93 patients were included in the study, 42 in the B-PTS no drain group and 51 in the S-AD with drains. 81% of all procedures were bilateral and 39% were immediate. Patients were discharged faster to the ward postoperatively and total hospital admission was reduced in the B-PTS group, 3.7 (SD = 1.4) days versus 4.7 (SD = 2.1) days in the standard group (P = 0 < 0.001 and 0.004 respectively). Less morphine was required postoperative day (POD) 1, 2 and 3 (P = 0.04, 0.03, 0.02 respectively), and time to mobilize was quicker but not statistically significant (P = 0.09) in the B-PTS group. Overall there were 18 patients in the S-AD group who had complications versus 9 in the B-PTS group (P = 0.14). The incidence of complications occurring within 30 days were lower in the B-PTS group (P = 0.05). The overall seroma rate was 5.4% and rates in the B-PTS group was 2.4% versus 7.8% in the S-AD group, P = 0.37.
[CONCLUSIONS] Use of barbed progressive tension sutures for abdominal closure after DIEP flap harvest can obviate the need for abdominal drains, reduce postoperative pain and encourage early discharge from the hospital without an increased risk in complications.
[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] III.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | abdominoplasty
|
복부성형술 | dict | 2 | |
| 시술 | diep flap
|
피판재건술 | dict | 2 | |
| 시술 | flap
|
피판재건술 | dict | 1 | |
| 해부 | breast
|
유방 | dict | 1 | |
| 해부 | abdominal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | seroma
|
장액종 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | perforator free-flap
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | abdominal drains
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | DIEP donor
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | abdominal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | morphine
|
C0026549
morphine
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 약물 | barbed
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [RESULTS] 93
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | DIEP
|
C0082274
diclofenac epolamine
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | postoperative pain
|
C0030201
Pain, Postoperative
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | Mayo
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | B-PTS
→ barbed progressive tension sutures
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques; Abdominoplasty; Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Drainage; Female; Free Tissue Flaps; Humans; Length of Stay; Mammaplasty; Middle Aged; Morphine; Postoperative Pain; Perforator Flap; Retrospective Studies; Seroma; Suture Techniques; Sutures; Tissue and Organ Harvesting; Transplant Donor Site
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Cutaneous fistula of the breast: A complication of cosmetic autologous fat transfer.
- Epidermal inclusion cyst after breast reduction mammoplasty.
- Case report of a rare soft tissue tuberculosis in a patient undergoing lipoabdominoplasty.
- What is the potential role of the nonopioid suzetrigine in pain management?